Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932484AbVKVAKR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:10:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932442AbVKVAKR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:10:17 -0500 Received: from 22.107.233.220.exetel.com.au ([220.233.107.22]:775 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932433AbVKVAKP (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:10:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:09:59 +1100 To: Christopher Friesen Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: netlink nlmsg_pid supposed to be pid or tid? Message-ID: <20051122000959.GA27615@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <43824F57.1040007@nortel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43824F57.1040007@nortel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Herbert Xu Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 794 Lines: 22 On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 04:51:03PM -0600, Christopher Friesen wrote: > > Should that be getsockname(2)? Anyways, I now understand the issues. Yes that's what I meant. > As it turns out, we were actually already calling getsockname() a bit > earlier in the code path, so we can just use the "pid" value from there. Excellent. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/