Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp5953761ybi; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:17:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8R5ZFfIAKbQ1la+3QuMfyJd3WLQjQiPjhM5zE2K35gpd8w4+tEkRkczL4GH5hNBBasMfm X-Received: by 2002:a63:ec02:: with SMTP id j2mr27208702pgh.340.1560363463388; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:17:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560363463; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0IunTzqB00zT2xGRBwbXkHN7I81PJ9Ekm9BrnYdMsKzpmPYabrAFXryRjOPJv4OCJ4 zV57a2meFQ9b/btSItd5KWlt/+QCm4uxkAEGsTSln4n3j5/FEbvyBQBaecMJWo3fFl89 xuxKUjyXtK+WHlQOM9n0a9Qq1/o48WkrnKC0b32QsSFl4vnMaA2Yc7Cf9gzjtd7Fq6c3 uJieM6inIZRHQ5Leq90bqeHNVgT6DWv8GeZASpaUJqExze26Ryw44cMpbC/dqqiT4Jlx de9s94FS3hyr4ZLi6rAkL6Nfgt+XnLUbB77pCvvoNUzTNlfHQvKDW3jeZBergjqQtKhG 8jFg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=mS3Nde8ai0pjTK4VEV0kJShxTHujJWaFKAhN82XKpaA=; b=OuHTTPm515jK2noOvVjPHgDtv+E4al0Yc6xpoI8mOeYmz+SD1KazfmfrhEt4j8fLM6 ugsqsc56auyEh+jXdI2QLVeR7bNOMVGG4VdOluZyVcbxTVHGZ/qWWclWzAmjK+eXvRJP jBr+IpbiE9eccQW30xtE01RJXM56uNxu7Mthi8eEe7Ekm4vOpixrOrA0GwiZUbPFMb8f AEne2lDBoDHgL3q0Qw04qQxq2zHMqm4ITwZix9vnDRSIJzLEZI2BtzFO+W/eVdaeO0Yt h4FHwmAVp1BYEO+Dyr4tK1EE9Fkuuz4UJmjbvMRwwlwfp54ubPQM2aRO8JIIw3BCOvDh 2DYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y15si382802pfe.133.2019.06.12.11.17.29; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726963AbfFLSNN (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:13:13 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:39466 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725878AbfFLSNN (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:13:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::3d5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A03B91528381F; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:13:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:13:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20190612.111312.2259455687333205958.davem@davemloft.net> To: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, antoine.tenart@bootlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, gregory.clement@bootlin.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, nadavh@marvell.com, stefanc@marvell.com, mw@semihalf.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] net: mvpp2: prs: Fixes for VID filtering From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20190611095143.2810-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> References: <20190611095143.2810-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Maxime Chevallier Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:51:41 +0200 > This series fixes some issues with VID filtering offload, mainly due to > the wrong ranges being used in the TCAM header parser. > > The first patch fixes a bug where removing a VLAN from a port's > whitelist would also remove it from other port's, if they are on the > same PPv2 instance. > > The second patch makes so that we don't invalidate the wrong TCAM > entries when clearing the whole whitelist. Series applied.