Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190612194409.197461-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> <20190612125911.509d79f2@cakuba.netronome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190612125911.509d79f2@cakuba.netronome.com>
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:25:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-JAZfEG5JoNEQn60gnucJB1gsrFeT38DieG12NQb9DFnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/static_key: always define static_branch_deferred_inc
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc:     peterz@infradead.org, Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:59 PM Jakub Kicinski
<jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:44:09 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> >
> > This interface is currently only defined if CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL. Make it
> > available also when jump labels are disabled.
> >
> > Fixes: ad282a8117d50 ("locking/static_key: Add support for deferred static branches")
> > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > The original patch went into 5.2-rc1, but this interface is not yet
> > used, so this could target either 5.2 or 5.3.
>
> Can we drop the Fixes tag?  It's an ugly omission but not a bug fix.
>
> Are you planning to switch clean_acked_data_enable() to the helper once
> merged?

Definitely, can do.

Perhaps it's easiest to send both as a single patch set through net-next, then?