Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190612194409.197461-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
 <20190612125911.509d79f2@cakuba.netronome.com> <CAF=yD-JAZfEG5JoNEQn60gnucJB1gsrFeT38DieG12NQb9DFnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190612135627.5eac995d@cakuba.netronome.com> <20190613093345.GQ3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190613093345.GQ3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:10:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-+DO4Khnn64LqxWNVZpNSqtc81N5tFwEYtYOQ=x-Afnxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/static_key: always define static_branch_deferred_inc
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 5:33 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:56:27PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:25:16 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:59 PM Jakub Kicinski
> > > <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:44:09 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > > > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > This interface is currently only defined if CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL. Make it
> > > > > available also when jump labels are disabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: ad282a8117d50 ("locking/static_key: Add support for deferred static branches")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > The original patch went into 5.2-rc1, but this interface is not yet
> > > > > used, so this could target either 5.2 or 5.3.
> > > >
> > > > Can we drop the Fixes tag?  It's an ugly omission but not a bug fix.
> > > >
> > > > Are you planning to switch clean_acked_data_enable() to the helper once
> > > > merged?
> > >
> > > Definitely, can do.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it's easiest to send both as a single patch set through net-next, then?
> >
> > I'd think so too, perhaps we can get a blessing from Peter for that :)
>
> Sure that works, I don't think there's anything else pending for this
> file to conflict with.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Great, thanks. Sent

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=113601