Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932091AbVKVEME (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:12:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932142AbVKVEME (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:12:04 -0500 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:5312 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932091AbVKVEMD (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:12:03 -0500 From: Neil Brown To: Jon Smirl Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:11:52 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17282.39560.978065.606788@cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Alan Cox , Dave Airlie , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Small PCI core patch In-Reply-To: message from Jon Smirl on Monday November 21 References: <20051121225303.GA19212@kroah.com> <20051121230136.GB19212@kroah.com> <1132616132.26560.62.camel@gaston> <21d7e9970511211647r4df761a2l287715368bf89eb6@mail.gmail.com> <1132623268.20233.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1132626478.26560.104.camel@gaston> <9e4733910511211923r69cdb835pf272ac745ae24ed7@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 X-face: v[Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D > 2) Temporarily accept the ugly drivers. Let desktop development > continue. Work hard on getting the vendors to see the light and go > open source. I doubt they will see 'the light' for many years without dollar signs attached. A question worth asking is: Who needs whom? Do we (FLOSS community) need them (Graphics hardware manufactures) or do they need us? Despite growth in Linux on Desktops, I think we need them a lot more than they need us. There is no question that making drives for these card that work nicely with Linux and xorg will take some substantial effort. And it isn't work that can be easily spread around the community due to various trade secret issues. This suggests, to me at least, that the work needs to be done by a fairly small group of people who can sign NDAs with NVidia or ATI and work with their engineers and with the community to develop the right interfaces and to make drivers that have a minimal closed-source component that lives in user-space. Who is going to pay these people to do this work? If you agree with the analysis of 'who needs whom', the logical answer is 'us'. Maybe we need a small consortium of companies with vested interest in OSS each ponying up half a million, and use this to employ two teams of graphics experts, one of which works within NVidia, and one within ATI. I suspect the two companies could be convinced to take on some free engineering support, if it was presented the right way. Anyone got a few dollars to spare? NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/