Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 18:10:04 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: potential uninitialized variable in probe()
Message-ID: <20190613101004.GB5242@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
References: <20190613065815.GF16334@mwanda>
 <20190613074922.GB21113@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
 <20190613081419.GG1893@kadam>
 <20190613095637.GA5242@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190613095637.GA5242@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:56:37PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:

[...]

> > In my experience it's better to initialize the return as late as
> > possible so that you get static checker warnings when you forget to set
> > the error code.
> 
> Just want to check one thing, which static checker you are using?

Okay, I think it's smatch :)

Thanks,
Leo Yan