Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp7054135ybi; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:48:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxPf8J7M4U+p1LHKLStMsmnefgAY2ZVKZC/4thUnCxm33q5PHzLy+ZlcNqnAmT51YeVltIM X-Received: by 2002:a62:fb18:: with SMTP id x24mr93244664pfm.76.1560440899129; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:48:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560440899; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uzHcl9/GAv18Y6jKyvs/Z05CL0luPa3N/ijK+5eSS2AsA8NOnejg1ZsLGQjigMdaqM kC2xkOXg76RrskVMLbOpz07wRjth5OsEnmG65V0W8ppdiDaqd9RVc7KrooUSRYebump9 csWo37s14g2eQJ2RXrAe7aUBa6zOZQsCNHbZu9K8awoR/yl88MO3Dh6F3V9n2YM2qPiL MdfD74sn75yRCt2ps9Eibm5fnfDVqX3J3qGRo9lLUt2bi5v/kFFuF3dWY7Ax7E3OMQUv ZJWPu4HCLWsUFTAH1pU7EhTr1ascXnmj/+E58WqjWVE+Vwek5DYJvwqCFaYZNZSLdFBT qW7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:message-id:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=iSGa/JDsR6P8jOmMpGaKDES7ytkHhiXcbpOriJgu+eo=; b=fvYIJS2lMSL3k78h+Qzma9V/UEshH0HhTOSOv2yfHSympqO8yuyYoQmYEV28jcMn7u jByM5DK+Iczz0iMNpC86Llq6sTJA4Juk+2MWBOyq6m/Ap/DZ5GSOZ/cZJh2xSyYp94yC XmZMyN6zBDocwuXNyAIOPb8SvvldpX9o4KxIMmICwOLuMGHAk+e2rtD2X4IT+kFWB068 iaBKZ4A8QiR3h/7CdwEgmP4+Y5SFFtSVl7ygSEmMD4Od2v58AOtVpwz7tcUOc4QXYt40 dX2G68bqhYLSRivyQZCx5dnql4tCia72RehdfDU4vgksAaYRH9xTYekgsWN3I7uidw9g 9xXQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s12si85400pgv.158.2019.06.13.08.48.04; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389483AbfFMPrB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:47:01 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:32858 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726603AbfFMJdE (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:33:04 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECB3AF22; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:33:03 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:33:02 +0200 From: Roman Penyaev To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rick Edgecombe , Andrey Ryabinin , Mike Rapoport , Roman Gushchin , Michal Hocko , "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: Check absolute error return from vmap_[p4d|pud|pmd|pte]_range() In-Reply-To: <1560413551-17460-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> References: <1560413551-17460-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Message-ID: <7cc6a46c50c2008bfb968c5e48af5a49@suse.de> X-Sender: rpenyaev@suse.de User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-06-13 10:12, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > vmap_pte_range() returns an -EBUSY when it encounters a non-empty PTE. > But > currently vmap_pmd_range() unifies both -EBUSY and -ENOMEM return code > as > -ENOMEM and send it up the call chain which is wrong. Interestingly > enough > vmap_page_range_noflush() tests for the absolute error return value > from > vmap_p4d_range() but it does not help because -EBUSY has been merged > with > -ENOMEM. So all it can return is -ENOMEM. Fix this by testing for > absolute > error return from vmap_pmd_range() all the way up to vmap_p4d_range(). I could not find any real external caller of vmap API who really cares about the errno, and frankly why they should? This is allocation path, allocation failed - game over. When you step on -EBUSY case something has gone completely wrong in your kernel, you get a big warning in your dmesg and it is already does not matter what errno you get. -- Roman