Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964841AbVKVIIM (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 03:08:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964890AbVKVIIL (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 03:08:11 -0500 Received: from 167.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.167]:15526 "HELO port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S964841AbVKVIIK (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 03:08:10 -0500 From: Denis Vlasenko To: Neil Brown Subject: Re: [RFC] Small PCI core patch Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:07:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Jon Smirl , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Alan Cox , Dave Airlie , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20051121225303.GA19212@kroah.com> <9e4733910511211923r69cdb835pf272ac745ae24ed7@mail.gmail.com> <17282.39560.978065.606788@cse.unsw.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <17282.39560.978065.606788@cse.unsw.edu.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511221007.12833.vda@ilport.com.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1703 Lines: 41 On Tuesday 22 November 2005 06:11, Neil Brown wrote: > I doubt they will see 'the light' for many years without dollar signs > attached. > > A question worth asking is: Who needs whom? Do we (FLOSS community) > need them (Graphics hardware manufactures) or do they need us? > Despite growth in Linux on Desktops, I think we need them a lot more > than they need us. [snip] > Who is going to pay these people to do this work? If you agree with > the analysis of 'who needs whom', the logical answer is 'us'. > > Maybe we need a small consortium of companies with vested interest in > OSS each ponying up half a million, and use this to employ two teams > of graphics experts, one of which works within NVidia, and one within > ATI. I suspect the two companies could be convinced to take on some > free engineering support, if it was presented the right way. > > Anyone got a few dollars to spare? Historically hackers were not too good at raising funds. Maybe we should use stuff which we are good at? Forcedeth is a nice precedent. 2d and especially 3d engines may be significantly harder to reverse engineer, but people can scale rather nicely, as kernel development shows. ;) Then write specs from gained knowledge and put it on a web page. IIRC reverese engineering for driver development is legal in most countries. If ATI/NVidia will sue Linux on this, then server-oriented companies (RedHat, IBM, ...) probably could provide defence. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/