Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964850AbVKVIQl (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 03:16:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964857AbVKVIQl (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 03:16:41 -0500 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:28564 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964850AbVKVIQk (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 03:16:40 -0500 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: what is our answer to ZFS? Organization: Private Site running Debian GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: <200511220115.17450.rob@landley.net> X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.7.8-20050315 ("Scalpay") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.13.4 (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:16:30 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 599 Lines: 14 In article <200511220115.17450.rob@landley.net> you wrote: > 18 quintillion inodes are enough to give every ipv4 address on the internet 4 > billion unique inodes. I take it this is not enough space for Sun to work > out a reasonable allocation strategy in? Yes, I think thats why they did it. However with ipv6, it bevomes 1-inode/node. Gruss Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/