Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 15:05:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 15:05:11 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:3057 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 15:05:00 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 12:05:24 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VM: 2.4.10ac4 vs. 2.4.11pre2 Message-ID: <20011006120524.A2625@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 01:20:23PM +0100, chris@scary.beasts.org wrote: > > Note that the above results were generated using a very simple (and > extensible) script. VM developers would do well to spend the 30 seconds > writing a similar script, and post results along with proposed VM patches. > Note to all Benchmark posters: If you have a script, you should either post it, or provide a link to where the script is available. Even if it's simple, it will help give reproducable results, or see if there may be a better way to test... Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/