Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190613.141247.955308190761079084.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20190527163253.27203-1-thuth@redhat.com> <20190613.141247.955308190761079084.davem@davemloft.net>
From:   Kjetil Oftedal <oftedal@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:04:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CALMQjD-dAX8hU6sNxDWtdxc7CddO3KDd9Fu_J74tZ-6pn5_Z5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: Remove redundant copy of the LGPL-2.0
To:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc:     thuth@redhat.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 13/06/2019, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:32:53 +0200
>
>> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
>> so there is no need for this additional copy here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>
> Applied.
>

Shouldn't the SPDX license identifiers in in arch/sparc/lib be adjusted to
reflect the original intent of LGPL licensing?

-
Kjetil Oftedal