Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:22:55 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
Cc:     "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] EDAC/amd64: Support more than two controllers for
 chip selects handling
Message-ID: <20190613222255.GH11598@zn.tnic>
References: <20190531234501.32826-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
 <20190531234501.32826-3-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
 <20190613141715.GD11598@zn.tnic>
 <SN6PR12MB263987AAB225A09527C4D736F8EF0@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR12MB263987AAB225A09527C4D736F8EF0@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:58:16PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> The first patch is meant as a fix for existing systems, and this patch
> is to add new functionality.
>
> I can merge them together if you think that's more appropriate.

Is it fixing such a critical issue that it needs to be a separate patch?
If so, it should be CC:stable.

But I think we've survived without it just fine so why bother. But maybe
there's an aspect I'm missing...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.