Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964997AbVKVQrj (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:47:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965000AbVKVQrj (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:47:39 -0500 Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com ([195.101.245.15]:17167 "EHLO p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964997AbVKVQri (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:47:38 -0500 Message-ID: <43834BA3.8090406@francetelecom.com> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:47:31 +0100 From: VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN Reply-To: eric2.valette@francetelecom.com Organization: Frnace Telecom R&D User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve French CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.com Subject: Re: CIFS improvements/wider testing needed References: <4381EFF3.8000201@austin.rr.com> <4382032D.4080606@francetelecom.com> <43823BF0.5050408@austin.rr.com> <4382E2A7.7080100@francetelecom.com> <43834052.4090509@austin.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <43834052.4090509@austin.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2005 16:47:31.0860 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E810D40:01C5EF84] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2533 Lines: 50 Steve French wrote: >>This makes me *really* wonder how you test your CIFS implementation. I >>would bet you use a Linux server with samba and not real Windows servers >>like Windows 2000 server or Windows 2003 server. I can perfectly >>understand that for development purpose because you can tarce the both >>side, then for validation I think using WindoWS NT (Ok Obsolete but >>still), Windows 2000 server or Windows 2003 server is mandatory. > There are two big test events for CIFS each year (Connectathon and the > SNIA CIFS conference) in which all of the major CIFS vendors servers and > clients (including the Linux cifs client) are tested together. These > two events has been the most helpful for me every year as they are for > many others on the Samba team (lots of Samba server progress also > happens in these two weeks). That is the best opportunity (almost the > only good opportunity) for testing against EMC, NetApp, Adaptec/SNAP, > AIX FastConnect, and the other NAS vendors - and at each event a few > client bugs have been fixed or client workarounds for server bugs have > been added as a result of this testing. For weekly testing there are > of course more test environments than mine, and I get feedback from > those testing against other server versions, but I have a small test > environment at home and also one at work (there are other unrelated test > groups that test the version of cifs and Samba before distro releases) > that I regularly test against. It would be impossible for one person to > test against the breadth of servers out there so community testing, > especially against the less well known servers, is encouraged. That is great that such "plug fest" exists and I agree with you that this is the only way to test compatibility to such scale. > In my test environment these are tested almost daily as target servers: > > 1) Samba version 3 (current) > 2) Windows XP service pack 2 Do you have collected any statistics on Windows server market share per windows version? I would bet 2000 Server is still mainstream with 2003 slowly replacing NT4 in term of percentage now that support is stopped. Idealy, may I suggest that dayly testing platforms, should match this real life Winddows server platform distribution. -- eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/