Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp789131ybi; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:25:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz2Fv65BQ+Z/hZz8wlgg/wy0snZmPudDakESrXNtIbrRTT/Kp9EoZxGhdYSJ4OSEzAN9QCH X-Received: by 2002:a62:7a8a:: with SMTP id v132mr75183736pfc.103.1560507959580; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:25:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560507959; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NzR5sl9XuzA7t3kSD/MlvVZqML0kA7f7K32ryn9HW0rpOjVWEiUlN/AQdGf0nrajev 3DkIvqnxknnqHIq3M8iRu+gVYXZgIKccT484RJCHo175L7hBQIWrPXIZGaUk36CprLTB m68LvD794QsSRW3PhoX5NVfQg/xYC+uMJMFKXAOfX772Mp+9sGqspxO+aGccdwdLvivo y9erkLT6+H65BU4nU9AVGfHYlL7S5DEGtukTkp52tA8fH+fEF4Z50+f6ZNgzT+goevTo fw9WnuMq98qnLMkKjM4JlPiiqFdV7V02oORg0M9BKVqrL6sdcf82UR7sWh4joWui1hHD l3HQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=gDB+XNA7ZiE3ZeXs47ZbYFwhKgN1q0BnwVeqWx+MlMw=; b=hP62oPKdQWYK0/GsrT3abXleVbpGq7fD1Zo7aBsFabZC0ctC1w58jnJEvU9K9sIoLt y5xLuHP9rs9RyngeVI/tziuCXw/Gzsi+cLTtXyENM4DcgZQntI069/WOLY9Z2P3MjSdR XO/DRL1E4jXe1NK9PIZk+wx3MTXGFJujpeQxzDLqA/N9cbexhtvNFjswCaNlZ+NCaa+Z 5gEjiIq7uOjzIpd1cOyUl/EVoKrFhAWI3wyqD65VQJY7qXo0hnlUmCOyzzKi1SkYqyM8 1+V6Bwyg0YVarjHr+fk9woNhnuJ40EwB4xt7POTW8JIZEyJqFY69IRB4vYxefdvQxJa9 zF9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cp18si1519182plb.287.2019.06.14.03.25.44; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727175AbfFNKX7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:23:59 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:58884 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726884AbfFNKX7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:23:59 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3953EF; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fuggles.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7F333F246; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:25:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:23:55 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Dave Martin Cc: Anisse Astier , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Richard Henderson , Rich Felker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kristina Martsenko , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Ricardo Salveti Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/sve: should not depend on Message-ID: <20190614102355.GE10659@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190613163801.21949-1-aastier@freebox.fr> <20190613171432.GA2790@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190613171432.GA2790@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+86 (6f28e57d73f2) () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 06:14:44PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 06:38:01PM +0200, Anisse Astier wrote: > > */ > > -#define SVE_PT_VL_INHERIT (PR_SVE_VL_INHERIT >> 16) > > -#define SVE_PT_VL_ONEXEC (PR_SVE_SET_VL_ONEXEC >> 16) > > +#define SVE_PT_VL_INHERIT (1 << 1) /* PR_SVE_VL_INHERIT */ > > +#define SVE_PT_VL_ONEXEC (1 << 2) /* PR_SVE_SET_VL_ONEXEC */ > > Makes sense, but... > > Since sve_context.h was already introduced to solve a closely related > problem, I wonder whether we can provide shadow definitions there, > similarly to way the arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h definitions are > derived. Although it's a slight abuse of that header, I think that > would be my preferred approach. Yes, that sounds better to me as well. Please send a v2! Will