Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp808611ybi; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:47:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwVqwYWjhZklbC8mgkD3RU0GAayHht1oHXobYEcfyOIx+iCNtoDgAOq1Iyv+3gwQcgWEaXG X-Received: by 2002:a63:c0e:: with SMTP id b14mr16469180pgl.4.1560509249850; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:47:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560509249; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QV+r7JKIHoU89gNpd4+lzf+EoQE5mEZC2Er2T/bdmCxJOcRPCjlAtWNsLapQelLOLb 7Th/dE+tTPURh2GKE0pX1gAMAQ6QmRKTD//BSFqtE+FWCWHdYwjbZyF2UfFgLf6Aw88d YuLWZ8fmzeFOWPYjUOz5iNnZgHXjwodEcA/s6tbjCacagKoGh0psaZspsRMoks57fC0q 9dZ74MOqrVkuY9nXCft/ZdpVPLjjSiyeLtsJLx3OHLEY7u454BMao13GdK4EmvkV2EoK SD18LuQpI4MC0GBSukn/o0fGIBzCIBEqf3m7WaSjibYyGkYssjocGx54Bld3IKusJN47 EbZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=zWEcFKs4yVETOlwW4Cb8yhnAwtEcNWV0lf2zjPHvtOU=; b=XUmpLGV2Q+TI0iToyqk2OySXi6SNK5pwfJLEjQUOwauyCmLUFtGijyOYDJFMD3MtGf JCv1K7EDfBvOPTD2wjhCke2LzA6nO/X1A7usH8V1I//utQVU5laLn9ujMzZWZXFT+CmT rT0m6f43YYLwmdnaphuQmzzOnaAHudqrvR+muWRTtdlWOL9w9ZLazQImBOe0XYcMFMfj ubMjk3rJ42XwadFpyH6VbMvMgjl+7Z9TVHKBfI0LTLVgoTLyZseBqNbvWQz6ozbdUEz/ K2ozz5yLmsXYKMFnLNHScgxM2QJtNwEK490krq7HkwKap9f/vhXJwWHYWgyKYAqxQUDV nVYg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m1si2267420pgt.93.2019.06.14.03.47.13; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727345AbfFNKpP (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:45:15 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:1446 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727018AbfFNKpP (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:45:15 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jun 2019 03:45:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from lahna.fi.intel.com (HELO lahna) ([10.237.72.157]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2019 03:45:12 -0700 Received: by lahna (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:45:11 +0300 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:45:11 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Furquan Shaikh , Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rajatja@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: PM: Clear wake-up device GPEs before enabling Message-ID: <20190614104511.GC2640@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20190516193616.252788-1-furquan@google.com> <13361760.nMXA0SR1Mq@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13361760.nMXA0SR1Mq@kreacher> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:24:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This patch may cause events to be missed if the GPE. I guess what you reall mean is > something like the patch below. > > This should allow the kernel to see the events generated before the GPEs are > implicitly enabled, but it should clear them for the explicit users of acpi_enable_gpe(). > > Mika, what do you think? Looks good to me. I also tested this with two TBT systems (Skull Canyon NUC and Dell XPS 9370) using ACPI hotplug and it did not cause any problems if I boot the system with device connected.