Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CGME20190614095320eucas1p2919a6169c997bb81c80416e8a0ede538@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
 <20190614095309.24100-1-l.luba@partner.samsung.com> <20190614095309.24100-2-l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
 <CAJKOXPeeVhHS62jiUgwySf5EYzW2Rkvu=HxyA7NjpGZFp=fWYQ@mail.gmail.com> <cbfa8fab-7cd0-1508-7b9b-482fefdb4de3@samsung.com>
In-Reply-To: <cbfa8fab-7cd0-1508-7b9b-482fefdb4de3@samsung.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:39:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPfmy6jKVF5f0vy9YOvbH8y0s_DHAR=P6+QbsRRHvLNd_g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/13] clk: samsung: add needed IDs for DMC clocks in Exynos5420
To:     Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Cc:     Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, mturquette@baylibre.com,
        sboyd@kernel.org,
        =?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogxbtvxYJuaWVya2lld2ljeg==?= 
        <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>, kgene@kernel.org,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, keescook@chromium.org, tony@atomide.com,
        jroedel@suse.de, treding@nvidia.com, digetx@gmail.com,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, willy.mh.wolff.ml@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 14:38, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/14/19 14:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > I do not quite understand why this patch is still being resent instead
> > of have been applied some time ago. Are there any issues here? Or are
> > there any issues with the entire patchset (except some review comments
> > to be resolved)? If not, then this is a dependency which should go
> > regardless of other patches. There is no point to keep it pending...
> > All other changes, e.g. DTS will have to wait for more cycles till
> > this gets in.
> >
> > Therefore either please apply this or please comment what is stopping
> > dependencies from being applied.
>
> Indeed the first 3 (clk) patches should not be part of the series any more,
> I have applied them few days ago - https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/6/554

Ahhh, I missed that. Sorry for the noise then and thanks!

Best regards,
Krzysztof