Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1098696ybi; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:36:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzv+XaJxfMsl9xREdS9bqRi9zUhjTj82be32zuLrsESl1qFV3jIRHl+GxuBKEoIELDVfJnM X-Received: by 2002:a62:5486:: with SMTP id i128mr99382407pfb.156.1560526565925; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560526565; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Lf14f7B2Tm2j3QTh/4lMafHGNcSaiihVqlxVzsmzjeqMfXTOBaQA0Qjc+VDf4IlRtm 9tyqJXJcJODUM9WcQPvTBBJkRGaeS9CGYF6TEYyzMI8bqOSQDCuAIXiTK9G5JlD4kM9c hEzCyZ8w4JWCxKJGcxgI5m0Ik4XRuKhbF52x1kgN93q12zOsxzmhSCLb9bxGn9/gXeib M1mt0zpuTM1p5kT+KpQVk6kQDCjw8UgH56sIhD/Mc4jbN80Y/oYOZkc5xE7/WvED+GmS Z0mU6JVc132EAgY2XyVWGVXel3OXYMaZBMnj2UQIUNlQN+TpC/KqXgmPEbaWUX46CYtZ Rr/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :dlp-reaction:dlp-version:dlp-product:content-language :accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:thread-index :thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=ESHBU6L1juImR0sALgJEOjaKpSB3m7BXr6jn4Ge+3/E=; b=bj+Hi5W9iSQsFHn8hLcyiwey0jrAJpwTThY5gCKQyn9wuSMlRA8Eex0pnq+Gqx9+tb 1V94MLTZ3919MNrh6czTc0vhbHhWr3iufhfi45cztOfQw9pcisHOMavz2hifOmugGrZm THZhq0+I5j5+65JSuvmRYGCZEfC+XPkhEPhmxW8J9SGPEU7R76Eolfn3FYOYiT/dmTgm E7TnpZxzz831WCpd6D2qwmt0BlHILtxO98gegkezVXSLkG2GIbwS5ifjjMm5pub2CWOD 39/D9UJVndqApvPjB3DBZgGEFeWfamnmpEBDk8u69vM0rsZ+gDIZ7QxS7cUD/9myGUDt nvrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c1si2482477pll.194.2019.06.14.08.35.50; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726659AbfFNPfk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:35:40 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:34880 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725780AbfFNPfj (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:35:39 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jun 2019 08:35:38 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from orsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.7]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jun 2019 08:35:38 -0700 Received: from orsmsx116.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.14) by ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:35:38 -0700 Received: from orsmsx110.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.60]) by ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.166]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:35:37 -0700 From: "Moore, Robert" To: Nikolaus Voss , "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , "Schmauss, Erik" , Jacek Anaszewski , Pavel Machek , Dan Murphy , Thierry Reding , "ACPI Devel Maling List" , "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" , "linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PWM List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: Resolve objects on host-directed table loads Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: Resolve objects on host-directed table loads Thread-Index: AQHVIPn/qqDB5Bv4z0aSsleXlAnDw6abVhaAgAADpwD///G0sA== Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:35:36 +0000 Message-ID: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E3B95EFB26@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMjNjOGUyNzEtODllMy00MDgxLWE0MmYtZTE5ZDRlOTBjZDFmIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoieHMzbXMwTW5xdTg0dUJueHJ5aWNNR0dQTDNaSWk1T0FNYlRldUk0TW0wMUlzWnp6cFwvN0dqNlAraXlyaTVweG0ifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.138] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----Original Message----- From: Nikolaus Voss [mailto:nv@vosn.de] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 2:26 AM To: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki ; Len Brown ; Moore, Robert ; Schmauss, Erik ; Jacek Anaszewski ; Pavel Machek ; Dan Murphy ; Thierry Reding ; ACPI Devel Maling List ; open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA) ; linux-leds@vger.kernel.org; Linux PWM List ; Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: Resolve objects on host-directed table loads Hi Rafael, On Fri, 14 Jun 2019, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:36 AM Nikolaus Voss > wrote: >> >> If an ACPI SSDT overlay is loaded after built-in tables have been >> loaded e.g. via configfs or efivar_ssdt_load() it is necessary to >> rewalk the namespace to resolve references. Without this, relative >> and absolute paths like ^PCI0.SBUS or \_SB.PCI0.SBUS are not resolved >> correctly. >> >> Make configfs load use the same method as efivar_ssdt_load(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Voss > > This is fine by me, so > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Or if you want me to take this patch (without the other two in the > series), please let me know. thanks. I think it would be the best if you take up this patch as it is an independent topic. In retrospect it wasn't a good idea to put it into this series. Kind regards, Niko I would have to ask, why is additional code needed for package initialization/resolution? It already happens elsewhere in acpica. Bob [...]