Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1163640ybi; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:39:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzxEZb5zOuSFPIyt++K9HV3qHS/3LBV8Pvcs0eKmgGZUq5jQ9uVMINyiRM3OTVVonmAEujy X-Received: by 2002:a63:6f8d:: with SMTP id k135mr36971440pgc.118.1560530351714; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:39:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560530351; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SlO+g/TPgBNgzq2cGJzlzyySxYPpvdmTraAV3nyOjQmkweejNEk1NYZvBWYXqIjEkt VLa8YGU83ThuhJmxJqVEU7uK/qf3nfqovcHSUU+kI/cPnEaHMGtC1h0aI49xsnijciHb Yj3LpTy0Zf1GLHV3C44Mdhup3iOo9WYDieDEqosplUd3OB91gEPSQgl4Zuu0/xGtOuXa +pG7+mY7MaEGu997fC9kFaINN4YA+zwqHRK7rnEmQhoeilF6HeRU3OOWbHd2RgqmDLjR ZtCfX9OprTrzPNKD9QCvRnw9KRXTC4NIYIV0Plh7YGG0Y9XSQgUMBCFucIpdSWsppO3c Syfw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=TdEh8Hj2Clq+kDMcSVX4CedsJJo6mgn0qth+pnhpxfk=; b=KbMzqjcXugRVjF9Wfo45HZJFxM2Gn1nhx54L2VeL9DMuJVChb/Rv44lCU5D25P0smE ylb+TyiPzO6DPaxxMf4Aq402hZIWFBgIjPEhPprfk7oPJ8x5Sp2ZIz4XMT3MSYntmnVP qHqX+0Te51bE7HVkj2Iv9s6olDzO+AZF4z6qC80KSKnhglGKPUD5WmJDkz4Bf7cKOVlF U5TK9oIdaRgb8CmBlcpn/bh9VZn77AtE7MPdQrmCrPmIGsI5m+LoyUzoOHOi5jekx9aI pnscY7WvhA8QW3UiULxspRRSJ+wjvh02KHm+/hR+cJouE7z6aH884CTiH27jMf0PQOz/ SL+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=MPl9AGMj; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z13si3072389pfr.86.2019.06.14.09.38.56; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=MPl9AGMj; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726138AbfFNQix (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:38:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-f68.google.com ([209.85.222.68]:36026 "EHLO mail-ua1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725859AbfFNQiv (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:38:51 -0400 Received: by mail-ua1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 89so391421uab.3 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:38:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TdEh8Hj2Clq+kDMcSVX4CedsJJo6mgn0qth+pnhpxfk=; b=MPl9AGMjmoNFxoC+q/LqmrAuv03V+OnvpDb1T2jOEFfQr1ybdUYboQYZPsQk7BPBH5 wpwjgQmzEr+uSKzyd5eykA2lnqJFEWo4AqFqsNv+kwS/HoGFi3WWX5tU1iHIzcRPsiF5 ERXHdmkt3SQzDx2AtHIxbcJeIEQ0DyJvFUU/U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TdEh8Hj2Clq+kDMcSVX4CedsJJo6mgn0qth+pnhpxfk=; b=AzL0VV3BjwG5v14zYbPyuZduCkUvXjYqmLAb8/ROBYsxsG8xrUjnXeeuk0uC8Xod1O PbqH5ph5PJ97mUCevg/e9vF63p+SqNvHQtV8+sKIRQ4YVYdxmk0blAvN69O2uIneGnhm hUrN4Z9Aumy+o25JrnLsJbQjcO1D8khvocs7NnxH4E20GgWxlPtcW37ocPPsXeaBkNlL O9ETln9iIvadTj/bnx0PS7pfK9Wz/8yYPEF/9RRX0jxOK2QoB3GDXqF1s9hJr7WEDz5G iIXaKmZnTHJdC+2xwkxuA1+nT9MxumTMv8OfZxW9QE8jP+Ou5yNYNrhbDMvGP4pCuywO fdbw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXachabkHh3de+HQwOgLbPDDZLchrd4uNsc8Iv280PtI471Tdx7 jrGU+QMdHauKX5OPNPN5OzS0JI0NGbo= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:45e3:: with SMTP id u90mr1687040uau.126.1560530329994; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ua1-f41.google.com (mail-ua1-f41.google.com. [209.85.222.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v21sm718296vso.14.2019.06.14.09.38.48 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-f41.google.com with SMTP id o19so1107298uap.13 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:38:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2a49:: with SMTP id p9mr2181727uar.0.1560530327904; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:38:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190613234153.59309-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20190613234153.59309-5-dianders@chromium.org> In-Reply-To: From: Doug Anderson Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:38:26 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mmc: core: Add sdio_retune_hold_now() and sdio_retune_release() To: Ulf Hansson , Arend van Spriel , Adrian Hunter Cc: Kalle Valo , brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Double Lo , Brian Norris , linux-wireless , Naveen Gupta , Madhan Mohan R , Matthias Kaehlcke , Wright Feng , Chi-Hsien Lin , netdev , brcm80211-dev-list , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Avri Altman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:10 AM Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 01:42, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > > > We want SDIO drivers to be able to temporarily stop retuning when the > > driver knows that the SDIO card is not in a state where retuning will > > work (maybe because the card is asleep). We'll move the relevant > > functions to a place where drivers can call them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson > > This looks good to me. > > BTW, seems like this series is best funneled via my mmc tree, no? In > such case, I need acks for the brcmfmac driver patches. For patch #1 I think it could just go in directly to the wireless tree. It should be fine to land the rest of the patches separately. For patch #2 - #5 then what you say makes sense to me. I suppose you'd want at least a Reviewed-by from Arend and an Ack from Kalle on the Broadcom patches? I'd also suggest that we Cc stable explicitly when applying. That's easy for #2 and #3 since they have a Fixes tag. For #4 and #5 I guess the question is how far back to go. Maybe Adrian has an opinion here since I think he's the one who experienced these problems. Thanks! -Doug