Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1200597ybi; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:17:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwqNyKUKr+Fako57FTVfA1uc6aKDgh40e03VCYLQd+ch5klptnOu9gunTG/FRdXQV0OgHYP X-Received: by 2002:a62:4c5:: with SMTP id 188mr99706785pfe.19.1560532663773; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:17:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560532663; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GDI4YVqsmwelVTHr3pNmKE1JX19r+Q2BwIGHPhWyhLTuyd2JsnP4cHp9lHQhZOAmF5 IFPGXrwEpkLSW2Mr0RN7/GyTxf7PR8meWqG5kAuZtxFHK3tcYyvhrGkLqFbyDAxie8yb GfbKrsnuPeHwFvSWlO1DfQ3aiagxaECY9Tmak0JVxElYPRthYoDIvdmeiCVTZfw1VonJ m04JKaB/q+5xQjco2DRJRZ3luFyIY/ax+7VTka6gab68FzykaVu36U4bVJjHFHtJkfd8 shhqk5xFGxCWmaN0PE5gx9zDvc7VzVYsGZlATfWhfIYwWhxSaiEC97a2KjwHJi+KGeDl Z51Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=7TRyUZx1zoQSYNZ+ER0doTkq7zshmk9cidJxpZCUNN4=; b=Mf0G5+ag0uPAuyLkJeXyEWb6qPCIBCC59q1VQpELAp4HVA3FO7/TGJDgHVU+TzdLBe tYOrUX2SP7bogtqeiay4nok9VJjbChZBuQOW11Et14KBXCK1+tEfGhZmZBAyJrBu+GOt uUy7fM1pTyt8cK8JNicdcl/MGtrzA9sCpW2ZGi0oI4Ltazq7BEIUfXCJRV5GZLtQfliS GJiQBF1T3mINGV92U3mOkw+3qprT6DjGEQrCLVxrv7kbPhcp0Qfryx5A+QQj+tpYU53y 5hEi3Y3iZAtlD7WaMl89nP3jBHWfqZIhW+wZi9Vnzrf8W1KE6/EmSMAcgd5cOmXXZklp YJ8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@broadcom.com header.s=google header.b=LjN3BmyE; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=broadcom.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w21si2977323pff.263.2019.06.14.10.17.28; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@broadcom.com header.s=google header.b=LjN3BmyE; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=broadcom.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726278AbfFNRRQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:17:16 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:37033 "EHLO mail-ed1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725837AbfFNRRQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:17:16 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id w13so4513769eds.4 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:17:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7TRyUZx1zoQSYNZ+ER0doTkq7zshmk9cidJxpZCUNN4=; b=LjN3BmyEOgpqPA02mygscd7VyN5kV9cjfsGWeoPqOr1iRbUnCUiGBfBlduft28awjQ 3hOd0leEfRmAgFtf7bNKcIe0ghSeeAQFaYXwhsqNKIIS2BnS89LBPnw3azQX+cdslalu 89o15ro4zPbbHmZG253IHizn846QyWeXGcwWk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7TRyUZx1zoQSYNZ+ER0doTkq7zshmk9cidJxpZCUNN4=; b=JM2XW6S0FY0ESR9fBEnMI6AUoIZI22GGuw3en5MxGVdEA7SDJC4SrlgR25441GrhPM o+/D518WAtlvMT6JOCNBAvNSMdJwaV3Rrkp1I6ljqNNbKCd4VCpo7s5QyvNBJDqE+IB0 zSi0DyWlx+Wm1RXy6ooWjxaLZubm+tCwX00Dj19imoKL36nEqLakTWQ3H9ndqY57BpLL SgbrAXdg5UsOrYWAA67daRepcGeLdog4RJMzZXN5yIoQVHMbR1M3QzGrrt6GszH35HTT 5iJuBIBWpJJ6oIs2R1M2xE3LAePAjGGLDM4ta05nyQnFu1C54fgo6K+Hc7ioQzuD0KPg jduw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUMUm+RCTCfgRQsugsx2+LbIdK1G5p1ZIKC4h+93aFQZlfldEye eH2JpOkrBHRGcT0eEBkFxHiHBw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:d791:: with SMTP id w17mr8370604edi.223.1560532634311; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.17] (f140230.upc-f.chello.nl. [80.56.140.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10sm764146ede.93.2019.06.14.10.17.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:17:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Arend Van Spriel To: Doug Anderson , Ulf Hansson , Adrian Hunter CC: Kalle Valo , , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Double Lo , Brian Norris , "linux-wireless" , Naveen Gupta , Madhan Mohan R , Matthias Kaehlcke , Wright Feng , "Chi-Hsien Lin" , netdev , "brcm80211-dev-list" , , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , Avri Altman Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:17:10 +0200 Message-ID: <16b56fe39f0.2764.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20190613234153.59309-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20190613234153.59309-5-dianders@chromium.org> User-Agent: AquaMail/1.20.0-1458 (build: 102100001) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mmc: core: Add sdio_retune_hold_now() and sdio_retune_release() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On June 14, 2019 6:38:51 PM Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:10 AM Ulf Hansson wrote: >> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 01:42, Douglas Anderson wrote: >> > >> > We want SDIO drivers to be able to temporarily stop retuning when the >> > driver knows that the SDIO card is not in a state where retuning will >> > work (maybe because the card is asleep). We'll move the relevant >> > functions to a place where drivers can call them. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson >> >> This looks good to me. >> >> BTW, seems like this series is best funneled via my mmc tree, no? In >> such case, I need acks for the brcmfmac driver patches. > > For patch #1 I think it could just go in directly to the wireless > tree. It should be fine to land the rest of the patches separately. Agree. > For patch #2 - #5 then what you say makes sense to me. I suppose > you'd want at least a Reviewed-by from Arend and an Ack from Kalle on > the Broadcom patches? Will do. > I'd also suggest that we Cc stable explicitly when applying. That's > easy for #2 and #3 since they have a Fixes tag. For #4 and #5 I guess > the question is how far back to go. Maybe Adrian has an opinion here > since I think he's the one who experienced these problems. I see if I can come up wit a fixes tag for #5. Regards, Arend