Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030190AbVKVWAg (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:00:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030192AbVKVWAZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:00:25 -0500 Received: from gateway.argo.co.il ([194.90.79.130]:30984 "EHLO argo2k.argo.co.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030190AbVKVWAI (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:00:08 -0500 Message-ID: <438394E1.8080505@argo.co.il> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:01 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Diego Calleja CC: jgarzik@pobox.com, jonsmirl@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, airlied@gmail.com, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Small PCI core patch References: <20051121225303.GA19212@kroah.com> <20051121230136.GB19212@kroah.com> <1132616132.26560.62.camel@gaston> <21d7e9970511211647r4df761a2l287715368bf89eb6@mail.gmail.com> <1132623268.20233.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1132626478.26560.104.camel@gaston> <9e4733910511211923r69cdb835pf272ac745ae24ed7@mail.gmail.com> <43833D61.9050400@argo.co.il> <20051122155143.GA30880@havoc.gtf.org> <43834400.3040506@argo.co.il> <20051122172650.72f454de.diegocg@gmail.com> <438348BB.1050504@argo.co.il> <20051122204910.a4bd1d1e.diegocg@gmail.com> <43837AD1.7060504@argo.co.il> <20051122214327.37b902e4.diegocg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20051122214327.37b902e4.diegocg@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2005 22:00:05.0973 (UTC) FILETIME=[18D39850:01C5EFB0] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1939 Lines: 61 Diego Calleja wrote: >El Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:08:49 +0200, >Avi Kivity escribi?: > > > >>None of the desktop Windows installations I'm aware of exhibit this. The >>recent versions of Windows are fairly stable. >> >> > >You don't seem to check frecuently windows help forums, where some people >speaks of nvidia as the number 1 "bluescreener"... > >Lots of windows drivers _are_ crappy. It's just a fact - some companies >hire the wrong people. Some companies (like nvidia) get money from being >fast, not from stability. This is a good example from a microsoft >programmer about how some companies cheat the WHQL certification to >get faster drivers... >http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2004/03/05/84469.aspx > >This one about silent install of drivers by "smart" installers is fun >too: http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2005/08/16/452141.aspx > > > Awsome. Certainly a very strong point against Windows drivers. > > >>Many people have hyperthreaded CPUs today. >> >> > >Hypertreaded CPUs can't run the two virtual cpus at the same time, > > Actually they are parallel at the instruction level. For the purpose of SMP-safety they are the same as true SMP. They just have different performance characterestics. >>It works well on the server, where Linux has a large and rising market >> >> > >Linux didn't always have a large market share on servers. Again, history >has shown that the path taken by linux until now is succesful. > > I hope you're right. But desktops are more complex, more varied, and have much more, er, interesting, users. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/