Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp1295810ybi; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:46:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3U/jpG11NgXH6zlKqlX4R1Ci4QsIEdz9wC2LHBZ6c/BpMh45QmXVobw4W7leV+zjfVw9O X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d817:: with SMTP id a23mr19723287pjv.54.1560674812761; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:46:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560674812; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fFa4z35vvCzuoFB+kld0d3JsTsbWbny0Z+rKqIS6j1KDH5LmLozWfik0pVaMXiqUrm 87ay7UdeE1tXnVGJUx7VzEc2ElrWlc+8k8maxrLbD2ejvNUrk079dnHtR/Zty5gYoCHe AaBe/R7eOBeLBFdpq46cQyL+IikVZwrvkACKeeAHG8BsU3PmAeCAy3CgclJGH0IbW0XU 3m8KVJBECDByKaR/kfgvwElSp3kFGq38QBWMpexji6wUc0lIAc1a5CkvjuZ5S/TcR1vJ k9rYP0JRQmSwElrfKm74Vev6OXbzRaamFRb1hEx9wASupGfu5vCfrBIrzndeov+pgPmx zTsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=iB/5HK7sD/wUapAwMijC7zo+w46z+aVIdlvgQ1BJxzg=; b=pqXSAKT35qoD7DrMlUnUrvHglcy1ijZmXoksA5oTJOHqOsHrALGBdpIXF+fCKNZ6wE pYuPjNGrqd8th9Ms/XsIp4Ae6QFm6YCfsPYasOW2DXEaiBOM1Paz+ULTIstaJjOdVyc0 uGAZP+aHzk7GBpaGfW2iRBfQhKn4iCHHOzmO1Q8pEsbrfMm1p1vR/0kBBLppQKxtu73p yAyy+C8Xpd+uZl4x1wBSCaUkN4qlq0oKFPTHaJHHxx5/vxnkoqThJR6GCyyD8sjkF3DF GkAu0ZOxUU3cTdVpTYrE4lTGeTaCQcEZ8Px6nDucnVQ1Hyuw47/XERsy3QJwnnU6l3ZF Q27A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i23si7686841pgh.26.2019.06.16.01.46.38; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726534AbfFPIpK (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 16 Jun 2019 04:45:10 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:41623 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725990AbfFPIpK (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jun 2019 04:45:10 -0400 Received: from p5b06daab.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.171] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hcQma-0007GQ-5m; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:45:00 +0200 Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:44:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Miroslav Benes cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, jikos@kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] stacktrace: Remove weak version of save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() In-Reply-To: <20190611141320.25359-2-mbenes@suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <20190611141320.25359-1-mbenes@suse.cz> <20190611141320.25359-2-mbenes@suse.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Miroslav Benes wrote: > Recent rework of stack trace infrastructure introduced a new set of > helpers for common stack trace operations (commit e9b98e162aa5 > ("stacktrace: Provide helpers for common stack trace operations") and > related). As a result, save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() is not directly > called anywhere. Livepatch, currently the only user of the reliable > stack trace feature, now calls stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable(). > > When CONFIG_HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE is set and depending on > CONFIG_ARCH_STACKWALK, stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable() calls either > arch_stack_walk_reliable() or mentioned save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(). > x86_64 defines the former, ppc64le the latter. All other architectures > do not have HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE and include/linux/stacktrace.h > defines -ENOSYS returning version for them. > > In short, stack_trace_save_tsk_reliable() returning -ENOSYS defined in > include/linux/stacktrace.h serves the same purpose as the old weak > version of save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() which is therefore no longer > needed. > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner