Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 16 Jun 2019 19:29:41 +0300
From:   Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/10] mm: reparent memcg kmem_caches on cgroup removal
Message-ID: <20190616162941.aqa4ae5j63nmjlp6@esperanza>
References: <20190611231813.3148843-1-guro@fb.com>
 <20190611231813.3148843-11-guro@fb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190611231813.3148843-11-guro@fb.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 04:18:13PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Let's reparent non-root kmem_caches on memcg offlining. This allows us
> to release the memory cgroup without waiting for the last outstanding
> kernel object (e.g. dentry used by another application).
> 
> Since the parent cgroup is already charged, everything we need to do
> is to splice the list of kmem_caches to the parent's kmem_caches list,
> swap the memcg pointer, drop the css refcounter for each kmem_cache
> and adjust the parent's css refcounter.
> 
> Please, note that kmem_cache->memcg_params.memcg isn't a stable
> pointer anymore. It's safe to read it under rcu_read_lock(),
> cgroup_mutex held, or any other way that protects the memory cgroup
> from being released.
> 
> We can race with the slab allocation and deallocation paths. It's not
> a big problem: parent's charge and slab global stats are always
> correct, and we don't care anymore about the child usage and global
> stats. The child cgroup is already offline, so we don't use or show it
> anywhere.
> 
> Local slab stats (NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE and NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE)
> aren't used anywhere except count_shadow_nodes(). But even there it
> won't break anything: after reparenting "nodes" will be 0 on child
> level (because we're already reparenting shrinker lists), and on
> parent level page stats always were 0, and this patch won't change
> anything.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>

Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>