Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1560741269.5187.7.camel@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 49/62] mm, x86: export several MKTME variables
From:   Kai Huang <kai.huang@linux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:14:29 +1200
In-Reply-To: <20190614115647.GI3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20190508144422.13171-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
         <20190508144422.13171-50-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
         <20190614115647.GI3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 13:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 05:44:09PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > KVM needs those variables to get/set memory encryption mask.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/mktme.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mktme.c b/arch/x86/mm/mktme.c
> > index df70651816a1..12f4266cf7ea 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/mktme.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mktme.c
> > @@ -7,13 +7,16 @@
> >  
> >  /* Mask to extract KeyID from physical address. */
> >  phys_addr_t mktme_keyid_mask;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mktme_keyid_mask);
> >  /*
> >   * Number of KeyIDs available for MKTME.
> >   * Excludes KeyID-0 which used by TME. MKTME KeyIDs start from 1.
> >   */
> >  int mktme_nr_keyids;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mktme_nr_keyids);
> >  /* Shift of KeyID within physical address. */
> >  int mktme_keyid_shift;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mktme_keyid_shift);
> >  
> >  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mktme_enabled_key);
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mktme_enabled_key);
> 
> NAK, don't export variables. Who owns the values, who enforces this?
> 

Both KVM and IOMMU driver need page_keyid() and mktme_keyid_shift to set page's keyID to the right
place in the PTE (of KVM EPT and VT-d DMA page table).

MKTME key type code need to know mktme_nr_keyids in order to alloc/free keyID.

Maybe better to introduce functions instead of exposing variables directly?

Or instead of introducing page_keyid(), we use page_encrypt_mask(), which essentially holds
"page_keyid() << mktme_keyid_shift"?

Thanks,
-Kai