Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp2257464ybi; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 01:28:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjfTpeMH/O3TnU0ewVMpJthFkOKgT7L10J0CNBttvFBGdL4S7K0/Yyn4j9qpAzHOikdpD3 X-Received: by 2002:a63:8841:: with SMTP id l62mr46581856pgd.246.1560760093397; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 01:28:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560760093; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hEPKFQj4zJvWjqQD/3IfTzXxTsBFV0K9RMYObFZsTHCRju4kyjsS5xuqw5Ky8hn1al nu2jjLMyPDNEcWKftJ2zjHCM881sUVL5dj+zthIZRKqGQDzDxq38dj9Tj1bqJZF52L8K jxtlqKTkV9ZNyzOt8Lg4VQ4HMIjLtxGHG2Bx6xUfzZnKWSySzMeoBbly3SALM5wQvqDr 8VKcfo9DVdow+6OYougd4glbZhOyksWF+R+KpseShPD4YMbOluzYG3CwsyqeqJvNC0QK YbCuG68XJBrzi5kmquX0TiVfrH1ltuYvh768FvV0lHJN3G437LcP0IOHwmc4oKpzok56 sb4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:from:subject:references :mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=UGH/ZD8XZqg1Lpk8YuejdU6YYNS5JjsOCwDCLK06nvg=; b=nYs9LJDffLYGB4n61hkXgsemdi68chUSpfFl8AL11/RAXRZT4Dl0f2kII4czvKPSRO 8THxLOyTxcYFpPQnqr8XPJt2degUpmbzq74X/rwDlNsCyJxPp3iNES2ta3jpWY5rSapZ IAf3HH7nSSDBg9yvDb/K1s0ev1LlrC8588sDAq4WbIrzeeEiEOhwTIut/ux5BzTCszWd a8anzwUVLSuWnrgPclKHkch9AGCYk5fvon26bg7JkHzoIuxHGB6Gg4qJ5erOxL78WQ32 GXf84hxmOZhgOfI/uIiCHdC3x0UEEg0Q+eclkSxhr5BrZ7Tl49zNsdtmawNhtsbmxIsU EAEw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HIdrbAOR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v5si9799961pgs.285.2019.06.17.01.27.58; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 01:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HIdrbAOR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725810AbfFQI1U (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 04:27:20 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-f201.google.com ([209.85.221.201]:54671 "EHLO mail-vk1-f201.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727857AbfFQI1T (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 04:27:19 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f201.google.com with SMTP id w137so1170766vkd.21 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 01:27:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=UGH/ZD8XZqg1Lpk8YuejdU6YYNS5JjsOCwDCLK06nvg=; b=HIdrbAOR7Ai/LT5HpVPA+L1IOqjcHwboymymGvsio8gFfBn2C56DUt29hM1bmIQQwf vx6PBweqZrvP9vfTIQLrC5N3eTal19Yn3037gWAQQn77e0nDPItuI8OfRf88xaBFVeLm CcPtiYoyIHN1muhpvzfRVLBkE34UQ/MjLuNzUpxTjFYC8khUiCrrn+H4G4vqbR9SONhq rRlCH8w2EI7zLsDDToSUJlwUhwHCySWFCc6CbEsMy0NmSuw1iD2mHvdhY0Ij6PypYsxE 0OyNE6X/8hyio8mWkbSQenznEXu0w2ax2qVNHVAlG3FolSoXJ+tPmqyrMrflBPVshQBm w8qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=UGH/ZD8XZqg1Lpk8YuejdU6YYNS5JjsOCwDCLK06nvg=; b=tn5LPoQ0oMXt8F4+3Ik9V0UlS1Iq+pIk44zR/6d9d/bw5c5wmE1HF0cM4ifEkwvZmx qbLpb+vi33UeDD7VCDn3yFZIR5z+ywWYGyOAOhMPRVDI0Gsdg3/JkJx5tJCTRarv+N4h K6mwIYVhavVdVUBxO9rv7WUKkgZfNlB1OB906ES5bhs0VhI9MHp6p5A1Urk9ScVkuq4x aM6kCmkiaLjTXaCwnm8lPRQnaGaQhro4RVz0s0NdvTX2yDbxnpRcrbOuXlzr/7bxTbbr ZI1J0iDKu0+STY4qnOq9yjtnNZPZZhxUgio6kTyq0OIWjCQqMwF7yHtXEm+1lwu67jNV V07Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU8vs60rExTYeLp04LlrCRx+vtQUOmM6sZwasO2eTHzaNLQgqSp e6cBHmO+bH9T0hiPYJ/wFdp22fSDK5KrsVGPJGKrQA== X-Received: by 2002:a67:d41d:: with SMTP id c29mr24889873vsj.101.1560760037365; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 01:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 01:26:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20190617082613.109131-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Message-Id: <20190617082613.109131-10-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20190617082613.109131-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog Subject: [PATCH v5 09/18] kunit: test: add support for test abort From: Brendan Higgins To: frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, keescook@google.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, Tim.Bird@sony.com, amir73il@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, jdike@addtoit.com, joel@jms.id.au, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, logang@deltatee.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, pmladek@suse.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, richard@nod.at, rientjes@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, wfg@linux.intel.com, Brendan Higgins Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add support for aborting/bailing out of test cases, which is needed for implementing assertions. An assertion is like an expectation, but bails out of the test case early if the assertion is not met. The idea with assertions is that you use them to state all the preconditions for your test. Logically speaking, these are the premises of the test case, so if a premise isn't true, there is no point in continuing the test case because there are no conclusions that can be drawn without the premises. Whereas, the expectation is the thing you are trying to prove. Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe --- include/kunit/test.h | 14 +++ include/kunit/try-catch.h | 69 +++++++++++++++ kunit/Makefile | 3 +- kunit/test.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- kunit/try-catch.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 342 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/kunit/try-catch.h create mode 100644 kunit/try-catch.c diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index e4c760ccc8717..194c85afc69a8 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include struct kunit_resource; @@ -167,15 +168,28 @@ struct kunit { /* private: internal use only. */ const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ + struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; spinlock_t lock; /* Gaurds all mutable test state. */ bool success; /* Protected by lock. */ + bool death_test; /* Protected by lock. */ struct list_head resources; /* Protected by lock. */ }; +static inline void kunit_set_death_test(struct kunit *test, bool death_test) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags); + test->death_test = death_test; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags); +} + void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name); void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_stream *stream); +void kunit_abort(struct kunit *test); + int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_module *module); /** diff --git a/include/kunit/try-catch.h b/include/kunit/try-catch.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..8a414a9af0b64 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/kunit/try-catch.h @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a + * controlled manner. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. + * Author: Brendan Higgins + */ + +#ifndef _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H +#define _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H + +#include + +typedef void (*kunit_try_catch_func_t)(void *); + +struct kunit; + +/* + * struct kunit_try_catch - provides a generic way to run code which might fail. + * @context: used to pass user data to the try and catch functions. + * + * kunit_try_catch provides a generic, architecture independent way to execute + * an arbitrary function of type kunit_try_catch_func_t which may bail out by + * calling kunit_try_catch_throw(). If kunit_try_catch_throw() is called, @try + * is stopped at the site of invocation and @catch is catch is called. + * + * struct kunit_try_catch provides a generic interface for the functionality + * needed to implement kunit->abort() which in turn is needed for implementing + * assertions. Assertions allow stating a precondition for a test simplifying + * how test cases are written and presented. + * + * Assertions are like expectations, except they abort (call + * kunit_try_catch_throw()) when the specified condition is not met. This is + * useful when you look at a test case as a logical statement about some piece + * of code, where assertions are the premises for the test case, and the + * conclusion is a set of predicates, rather expectations, that must all be + * true. If your premises are violated, it does not makes sense to continue. + */ +struct kunit_try_catch { + /* private: internal use only. */ + struct kunit *test; + struct completion *try_completion; + int try_result; + kunit_try_catch_func_t try; + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch; + void *context; +}; + +void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, + struct kunit *test, + kunit_try_catch_func_t try, + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch); + +void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context); + +void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); + +static inline int kunit_try_catch_get_result(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch) +{ + return try_catch->try_result; +} + +/* + * Exposed for testing only. + */ +void kunit_generic_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch); + +#endif /* _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H */ diff --git a/kunit/Makefile b/kunit/Makefile index 60a9ea6cb4697..1f7680cfa11ad 100644 --- a/kunit/Makefile +++ b/kunit/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += test.o \ string-stream.o \ - kunit-stream.o + kunit-stream.o \ + try-catch.o obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += string-stream-test.o diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c index 0ba05467d525f..cb07e0916e901 100644 --- a/kunit/test.c +++ b/kunit/test.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include #include +#include static bool kunit_get_success(struct kunit *test) { @@ -30,6 +31,18 @@ static void kunit_set_success(struct kunit *test, bool success) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags); } +static bool kunit_get_death_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + unsigned long flags; + bool death_test; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags); + death_test = test->death_test; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags); + + return death_test; +} + static int kunit_vprintk_emit(int level, const char *fmt, va_list args) { return vprintk_emit(0, level, NULL, 0, fmt, args); @@ -145,41 +158,175 @@ void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_stream *stream) kunit_stream_commit(stream); } +void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *test) +{ + kunit_set_death_test(test, true); + + kunit_try_catch_throw(&test->try_catch); + + /* + * Throw could not abort from test. + * + * XXX: we should never reach this line! As kunit_try_catch_throw is + * marked __noreturn. + */ + WARN_ONCE(true, "Throw could not abort from test!\n"); +} + void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name) { spin_lock_init(&test->lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&test->resources); test->name = name; test->success = true; + test->death_test = false; } /* - * Performs all logic to run a test case. + * Initializes and runs test case. Does not clean up or do post validations. */ -static void kunit_run_case(struct kunit_module *module, - struct kunit_case *test_case) +static void kunit_run_case_internal(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_module *module, + struct kunit_case *test_case) { - struct kunit test; - int ret = 0; - - kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name); + int ret; if (module->init) { - ret = module->init(&test); + ret = module->init(test); if (ret) { - kunit_err(&test, "failed to initialize: %d\n", ret); - kunit_set_success(&test, false); + kunit_err(test, "failed to initialize: %d\n", ret); + kunit_set_success(test, false); return; } } - if (!ret) - test_case->run_case(&test); + test_case->run_case(test); +} + +static void kunit_case_internal_cleanup(struct kunit *test) +{ + kunit_cleanup(test); +} +/* + * Performs post validations and cleanup after a test case was run. + * XXX: Should ONLY BE CALLED AFTER kunit_run_case_internal! + */ +static void kunit_run_case_cleanup(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_module *module) +{ if (module->exit) - module->exit(&test); + module->exit(test); + + kunit_case_internal_cleanup(test); +} + +/* + * Handles an unexpected crash in a test case. + */ +static void kunit_handle_test_crash(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_module *module, + struct kunit_case *test_case) +{ + kunit_err(test, "kunit test case crashed!"); + /* + * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): This prints the stack trace up + * through this frame, not up to the frame that caused the crash. + */ + show_stack(NULL, NULL); + + kunit_case_internal_cleanup(test); +} + +struct kunit_try_catch_context { + struct kunit *test; + struct kunit_module *module; + struct kunit_case *test_case; +}; + +static void kunit_try_run_case(void *data) +{ + struct kunit_try_catch_context *ctx = data; + struct kunit *test = ctx->test; + struct kunit_module *module = ctx->module; + struct kunit_case *test_case = ctx->test_case; + + /* + * kunit_run_case_internal may encounter a fatal error; if it does, + * abort will be called, this thread will exit, and finally the parent + * thread will resume control and handle any necessary clean up. + */ + kunit_run_case_internal(test, module, test_case); + /* This line may never be reached. */ + kunit_run_case_cleanup(test, module); +} + +static void kunit_catch_run_case(void *data) +{ + struct kunit_try_catch_context *ctx = data; + struct kunit *test = ctx->test; + struct kunit_module *module = ctx->module; + struct kunit_case *test_case = ctx->test_case; + int try_exit_code = kunit_try_catch_get_result(&test->try_catch); + + if (try_exit_code) { + kunit_set_success(test, false); + /* + * Test case could not finish, we have no idea what state it is + * in, so don't do clean up. + */ + if (try_exit_code == -ETIMEDOUT) + kunit_err(test, "test case timed out\n"); + /* + * Unknown internal error occurred preventing test case from + * running, so there is nothing to clean up. + */ + else + kunit_err(test, "internal error occurred preventing test case from running: %d\n", + try_exit_code); + return; + } + + if (kunit_get_death_test(test)) { + /* + * EXPECTED DEATH: kunit_run_case_internal encountered + * anticipated fatal error. Everything should be in a safe + * state. + */ + kunit_run_case_cleanup(test, module); + } else { + /* + * UNEXPECTED DEATH: kunit_run_case_internal encountered an + * unanticipated fatal error. We have no idea what the state of + * the test case is in. + */ + kunit_handle_test_crash(test, module, test_case); + kunit_set_success(test, false); + } +} + +/* + * Performs all logic to run a test case. It also catches most errors that + * occurs in a test case and reports them as failures. + */ +static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_module *module, + struct kunit_case *test_case) +{ + struct kunit_try_catch_context context; + struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch; + struct kunit test; + + kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name); + try_catch = &test.try_catch; - kunit_cleanup(&test); + kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch, + &test, + kunit_try_run_case, + kunit_catch_run_case); + context.test = &test; + context.module = module; + context.test_case = test_case; + kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context); test_case->success = kunit_get_success(&test); } @@ -192,7 +339,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_module *module) kunit_print_subtest_start(module); for (test_case = module->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++) { - kunit_run_case(module, test_case); + kunit_run_case_catch_errors(module, test_case); kunit_print_test_case_ok_not_ok(test_case, test_case_count++); } diff --git a/kunit/try-catch.c b/kunit/try-catch.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..de580f074387b --- /dev/null +++ b/kunit/try-catch.c @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a + * controlled manner. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. + * Author: Brendan Higgins + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include + +void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch) +{ + try_catch->try_result = -EFAULT; + complete_and_exit(try_catch->try_completion, -EFAULT); +} + +static int kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter(void *data) +{ + struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = data; + + try_catch->try(try_catch->context); + + complete_and_exit(try_catch->try_completion, 0); +} + +void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context) +{ + DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(try_completion); + struct kunit *test = try_catch->test; + struct task_struct *task_struct; + int exit_code, status; + + try_catch->context = context; + try_catch->try_completion = &try_completion; + try_catch->try_result = 0; + task_struct = kthread_run(kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter, + try_catch, + "kunit_try_catch_thread"); + if (IS_ERR(task_struct)) { + try_catch->catch(try_catch->context); + return; + } + + /* + * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): We should probably have some type of + * variable timeout here. The only question is what that timeout value + * should be. + * + * The intention has always been, at some point, to be able to label + * tests with some type of size bucket (unit/small, integration/medium, + * large/system/end-to-end, etc), where each size bucket would get a + * default timeout value kind of like what Bazel does: + * https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/be/common-definitions.html#test.size + * There is still some debate to be had on exactly how we do this. (For + * one, we probably want to have some sort of test runner level + * timeout.) + * + * For more background on this topic, see: + * https://mike-bland.com/2011/11/01/small-medium-large.html + */ + status = wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion, + 300 * MSEC_PER_SEC); /* 5 min */ + if (status < 0) { + kunit_err(test, "try timed out\n"); + try_catch->try_result = -ETIMEDOUT; + } + + exit_code = try_catch->try_result; + + if (!exit_code) + return; + + if (exit_code == -EFAULT) + try_catch->try_result = 0; + else if (exit_code == -EINTR) + kunit_err(test, "wake_up_process() was never called\n"); + else if (exit_code) + kunit_err(test, "Unknown error: %d\n", exit_code); + + try_catch->catch(try_catch->context); +} + +void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, + struct kunit *test, + kunit_try_catch_func_t try, + kunit_try_catch_func_t catch) +{ + try_catch->test = test; + try_catch->try = try; + try_catch->catch = catch; +} -- 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog