Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030382AbVKWKQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:16:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030384AbVKWKQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:16:40 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]:61122 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030382AbVKWKQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:16:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4384417B.9040201@colitti.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:16:27 +0100 From: Lorenzo Colitti User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: Nigel Cunningham , Greg KH , Dumitru Ciobarcianu , Linux-pm mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp References: <20051115212942.GA9828@elf.ucw.cz> <20051115222549.GF17023@redhat.com> <20051115233201.GA10143@elf.ucw.cz> <1132115730.2499.37.camel@localhost> <20051116061459.GA31181@kroah.com> <1132120845.25230.13.camel@localhost> <20051116165023.GB5630@kroah.com> <1132171051.25230.53.camel@localhost> <20051116213517.GD12505@elf.ucw.cz> <1132175248.25230.104.camel@localhost> <20051116224728.GI12505@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20051116224728.GI12505@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:d113ea4d80cc67690fe2d9dbc522612b Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1113 Lines: 28 Pavel Machek wrote: > Yes, hopefully users will not notice. ? So the idea is to merge inferior code and "hope users won't notice"? Users might not notice that half their memory is gone, but they *will* notice that their system is dog slow when it resumes because all their caches are gone and a most of their stuff is swapped out. Non-responsive system on resume is one of the main reasons that swsusp2 is much better than swsusp1, and yes, users *do* notice (I was one of them, as I pointed out a while back). Yes, 50% is better than nothing, but it's still a pretty poor show. Seen from the perspective of a user, the situation is simple: suspend2 works, it's fast, and it's rock-solid. Just use it. Regards, Lorenzo P.S. Don't "show me the code" me. I can't write the code. :-) But based on what I see of how well suspend2 works, I think Nigel can... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/