Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:22:43 +0100
From:   Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Uwe Kleine-Konig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] sched: Add new tracepoints required for EAS
 testing
Message-ID: <20190617162243.4gfzi7bpwbecv4xz@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <20190604111459.2862-1-qais.yousef@arm.com>
 <20190617125122.ph4wb7mcvfjwpdce@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20190617155549.GI3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190617155549.GI3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 06/17/19 17:55, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > Hi Peter
> > 
> > On 06/04/19 12:14, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > 	- Split pelt_rq TP into pelt_cfs, pelt_rq, pelt_dl and pelt_irq
> > > 	- Replace the fatty preprocessing wrappers with exported helper
> > > 	  functions to access data in unexported structures.
> > > 	- Remove the now unnecessary headers that were introduced in the
> > > 	  previous versions.
> > > 	- Postfix the tracepoints with '_tp' to make them standout more in the
> > > 	  code as bare tracepoints with no events associated.
> > > 	- Updated the example module in [2]
> > > 		- It demonstrates now how to convert the tracepoints into trace
> > > 		  events that extend the sched events subsystem in tracefs.
> > 
> > Does this look okay now? If you have further comments please let me know so
> > I can address them in time in hope it'd make it to the next merge window.
> 
> Picked them up (with some minor edits). I feel there is far too much

Thanks!

> #ifdef in patch #2, but I couldn't quickly come up with anything much
> saner either.

We can protect the whole lot with #ifdef CONFIG_SMP? It means the external
module will fail to compile for UP configurations - which is fine I think since
we're just returning NULL anyway..

--
Qais Yousef