Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:41:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
To: akpm@osdl.org
cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + dont-include-schedh-from-moduleh.patch added to -mm tree
In-Reply-To: <200511050726.jA57QPs7009905@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511231328020.27662@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de>
References: <200511050726.jA57QPs7009905@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1181
Lines: 27

Things seem to converge in Linus' tree now.

I've rerun my ctags+grep based analysis for all architecures on 
2.6.15-rc1-git6 and 2.6.5-rc2 with the following patches from -mm applied:
  fix-missing-includes-for-2614-git11.patch
  fix-missing-includes-for-2615-rc1.patch
  dont-include-schedh-from-moduleh.patch
I also compile-tested these trees on alpha, arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc,  
ppc64, and x86_64 and checked that make -i outputs the same diagnostic 
messages (modulo line number and include order changes) for allnoconfig, 
defconfig, and allmodconfig, whether or not 
dont-include-schedh-from-moduleh.patch was applied to the tree.

None of this brought up any problems.
So from my point of view these patches are okay to go into mainline now.

Andrew, what are your plans for these patches?
Shall I send an updated dont-include-schedh-from-moduleh.patch whose 
changelog reflects the current state of testing?

Thanks,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/