Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 18:38:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 18:37:49 -0400 Received: from [195.223.140.107] ([195.223.140.107]:10237 "EHLO athlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 18:36:53 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 00:36:43 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: chris@scary.beasts.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VM: 2.4.10ac4 vs. 2.4.11pre2 Message-ID: <20011007003643.K724@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from chris@scary.beasts.org on Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 01:20:23PM +0100 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 01:20:23PM +0100, chris@scary.beasts.org wrote: > > dbench 8 34Mbyte/sec 40Mbyte/sec dbench wants a very unfair vm behaviour. We must penalize all tasks except one. I measured a x2 slowdown after Linus introduced mark_page_accessed after 2.4.10pre11 (but still it was faster than pre10). If you want patches to make dbench much faster I can provide them, just ask, at the moment I just think dbench is a very bad benchmark. I can implement a /proc/sys/vm/dbench if people wants to post nice numbers without having to apply patches :). I'd also like to know what you get using -aa instead of mainline, there are a few changes that can make a difference in the numbers. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/