Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 23:32:01 +0200
From:   Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: LAPIC: add advance timer support to
 pi_inject_timer
Message-ID: <20190617213201.GA26346@flask>
References: <1560770687-23227-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
 <1560770687-23227-6-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1560770687-23227-6-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

2019-06-17 19:24+0800, Wanpeng Li:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> 
> Wait before calling posted-interrupt deliver function directly to add 
> advance timer support to pi_inject_timer.
> 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> ---

Please merge this patch with [2/5], so bisection doesn't break.

>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c   | 6 ++++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h   | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c     | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 1a31389..1a31ba5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1462,6 +1462,8 @@ static void apic_timer_expired(struct kvm_lapic *apic, bool can_pi_inject)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (can_pi_inject && posted_interrupt_inject_timer(apic->vcpu)) {
> +		if (apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns)
> +			kvm_wait_lapic_expire(vcpu, true);

From where does kvm_wait_lapic_expire() take
apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline?

(I think it would be best to take the functional core of
 kvm_wait_lapic_expire() and make it into a function that takes the
 expired_tscdeadline as an argument.)

Thanks.