From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>
To: moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Use enum to declare errno values
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:27:27 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20051123132443.32793.qmail@web25813.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051123132443.32793.qmail@web25813.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200511231627.27252.vda@ilport.com.ua>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 687
Lines: 19

On Wednesday 23 November 2005 15:24, moreau francis wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> I'm just wondering why not declaring errno values using enumaration ? It is 
> just more convenient when debuging the kernel.

enums are really nice substitute for integer constants instead of
#defines. They obey scope rules. #defines do not.

However enums are not widely used because of
1. tradition and style
2. awkward syntax required:   enum { CONST = 1234 };
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/