Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp3142512ybi; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:35:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8eusdxIcd+esf2YnnjJHHWfFs+MCWH+moExrCm0t8tugEsbu/5NVsJt1tEXAEqPKyxy1D X-Received: by 2002:a63:4d08:: with SMTP id a8mr61629pgb.329.1560818154229; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:35:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560818154; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k481ZdOBmwa280Lhi1M7BxrjyN7GioxH7PqKIrwg2T7HyOJ8dTqyEqZH27dDTTR5RJ 5d5RjioaBkJFwRxOSI3P8OLW/mMxwm5lZbbkR405d/BWWamsQqFpQGM38jf5yRzpSM/S w62np0rOkSX3z0qW/fChAq7fB4+v6JAboKivtIMagjDDmh9ppYuXywL/CcRFhBJVNLG4 Cz+W25HpIa3enMgAMeWniCQTX5JUtgK9kJerx1pj4DtZHBOdX2orX4VaH9FiuDoBYhr9 uZryJ5ufINxsk/kjtH+Q8SwMBOQDV2ZPF+SOH8gEtxtOH5DRk8jjzL506qj1i8WN8IxU wlBA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=qETu5gkd+kWozQLOI0tdWFOpyOwPNFgXHRZvfET+Xhw=; b=DY0m11vhvtBna9YBetoZKYKCslvbCCj//QborioNbtum8Mh6MVhTG/SgQOhCcXBtnr Wp/RmV8n/2f64RqMwmCzVHvNzr9OEXDFdOHINdrjnOQ0gUbR1oSUkyIq71uuSuTDo3j8 0Hi3/fDt66wtksaYAzF+t49TjjxBoAqZwYL8nO/9qVx6bkog/ieFDdI1lg1LtepY1Ik3 iwarz4iFN4T5AHK2lJAQqxZ99LegzcI89X+1q7UoTsqNfUCtbitwewdZDehb6mfcbCMO q/QZRvsjFraKF2YfRiO9q2JAqQksP9E6s8QiNG2Bm1Pn57H3J5+6OerzN3FI3+zIu/EQ yc8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DK5h054R; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x123si11851222pfx.157.2019.06.17.17.35.39; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DK5h054R; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726336AbfFRAfg (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 20:35:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:36847 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725829AbfFRAff (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 20:35:35 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id n4so3857463wrs.3; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qETu5gkd+kWozQLOI0tdWFOpyOwPNFgXHRZvfET+Xhw=; b=DK5h054Rn6wGZi/ZouF5j9HKZDl9o7A1whpnNNWMKTF38nwjB4hak08MP536T4etUs a7N9OgcYcIvBxhEGGBd35URBCRkk+sx2glCYXrtON3PBOF28EjjTjFcQkS6U5js9jfnL 85YIuQjGOhEOuZK979VnFx3igySso5SsPgS6013+JNRs4x80CXRMJMnnrP2nvFWaK/m6 nX0LVKMywNUffPKpaNNaOsaiyP9iqXgAGQULfNd6SyKpGXt52AnAz4EOiNzkFqQiWWSi 5XwhusyCNdafT8NrbPmnK3rAEXSzPhzUDfIUmoDA6sRcLSoaje7Wk5y6eH0s59tl/aOP roKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qETu5gkd+kWozQLOI0tdWFOpyOwPNFgXHRZvfET+Xhw=; b=cNffg4v5sf7S+XCmwuxMcS7yUz75OecTwr/iR3Q3aEgtqa2mBdSBvdWZ5dIrka3/lq LjT6radqdyeHao+riN5XcZI6iIBIpHYZUajcY6UfJqAgYgYmeRtxQ2IRT99WiTy0GUkX nCE4InY9NqqQZoD2sHSHw6LAKESLfYF8QCyFonF2m+7uOznn+lI+NcFKqP4RzvYtle+8 6B8OqblONv2xDEHe4esEjvRNPdbTRaj23S894BArzFjJi4Il5TOmUgUa69yFb97+CtPm iHWbf9Kjcu4Naxb0OBOYBnA5v0wyeVEVz3glOVmmwwOGcWjGJSWwjF9U5Y9WMK4fbOaF +i6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWeChxn0JxpK6DwFC5Abb3lnKsKlY82sbT7adWwvN19M64iWZKj nP5+7GfX49IsYkgYIT3Gylruy6ejV3WmN0h45IY= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4647:: with SMTP id j7mr7526631wrs.334.1560818133023; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:35:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190617122000.22181-1-hch@lst.de> <20190617122000.22181-2-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20190617122000.22181-2-hch@lst.de> From: Ming Lei Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:35:21 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] scsi: add a host / host template field for the virt boundary To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" , Sagi Grimberg , Max Gurtovoy , Bart Van Assche , linux-rdma , Linux SCSI List , megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:21 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This allows drivers setting it up easily instead of branching out to > block layer calls in slave_alloc, and ensures the upgraded > max_segment_size setting gets picked up by the DMA layer. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > drivers/scsi/hosts.c | 3 +++ > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 3 ++- > include/scsi/scsi_host.h | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c > index ff0d8c6a8d0c..55522b7162d3 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c > @@ -462,6 +462,9 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize) > else > shost->dma_boundary = 0xffffffff; > > + if (sht->virt_boundary_mask) > + shost->virt_boundary_mask = sht->virt_boundary_mask; > + > device_initialize(&shost->shost_gendev); > dev_set_name(&shost->shost_gendev, "host%d", shost->host_no); > shost->shost_gendev.bus = &scsi_bus_type; > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > index 65d0a10c76ad..d333bb6b1c59 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > @@ -1775,7 +1775,8 @@ void __scsi_init_queue(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct request_queue *q) > dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary); > > blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, shost->max_segment_size); > - dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, shost->max_segment_size); > + blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, shost->virt_boundary_mask); > + dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, queue_max_segment_size(q)); The patch looks fine, also suggest to make sure that max_segment_size is block-size aligned, and un-aligned max segment size has caused trouble on mmc. Thanks, Ming Lei