Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:15:53 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] printk: new ringbuffer implementation
Message-ID: <20190618071553.tkxw6gvh6bfwdhec@pathway.suse.cz>
References: <20190607162349.18199-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906172309170.1963@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906172309170.1963@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170912 (1.9.0)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon 2019-06-17 23:09:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2019, John Ogness wrote:
> 
> Polite ping ....

I have started looking at the patchset yesterday. I informed John
that I was busy last week via a personal mail.

My first impression is very good. But I still have to dive much more
into the code.

Best Regards,
Petr