Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:53:43 +0200
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
        Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG]: mm/vmalloc: uninitialized variable access in
 pcpu_get_vm_areas
Message-ID: <20190618085343.i6trqxavavkfipzb@pc636>
References: <20190617121427.77565-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20190617141244.5x22nrylw7hodafp@pc636>
 <CAK8P3a3sjuyeQBUprGFGCXUSDAJN_+c+2z=pCR5J05rByBVByQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a0pnEnzfMkCi7Nb97-nG4vnAj7fOepfOaW0OtywP8TLpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190617165730.5l7z47n3vg73q7mp@pc636>
 <CAK8P3a1Ab2MVVgSh4EW0Yef_BsxcRbkxarknMzV7tOA+s79qsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a0965MhQfpygCqxqnocLt9f4L80-mF-UgoP5OdAoLCCqw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0965MhQfpygCqxqnocLt9f4L80-mF-UgoP5OdAoLCCqw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello, Arnd.

> 
> Nevermind, the warning came back after all. It's now down to
> one out of 2000 randconfig builds I tested, but that's not good
> enough. I'll send a patch the way you suggested.
> 
Makes sense to me :)

Thank you.

--
Vlad Rezki