Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 19:36:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 19:35:52 -0400 Received: from shed.alex.org.uk ([195.224.53.219]:49333 "HELO shed.alex.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 19:35:42 -0400 Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 00:36:09 +0100 From: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Reply-To: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel To: Mikulas Patocka , Alan Cox Cc: Anton Blanchard , Rik van Riel , Krzysztof Rusocki , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel Subject: Re: %u-order allocation failed Message-ID: <483005851.1002414968@[195.224.237.69]> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --On Sunday, 07 October, 2001 12:58 AM +0200 Mikulas Patocka wrote: > How do you know it? I showed a simple case where it may happen. Do you know two order=0 allocations with the same GFP_ value would not have also failed? -- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/