Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:37:30 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/mm: Identify the end of the kernel area to be
 reserved
Message-ID: <20190618093730.GA5629@zn.tnic>
References: <cover.1560546537.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
 <284d3650e2dae50d5645310a8b49664398fe5223.1560546537.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
 <20190617104740.GG27127@zn.tnic>
 <7a35c79d-370e-5595-234e-0aafc527331b@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7a35c79d-370e-5595-234e-0aafc527331b@amd.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 01:43:00AM +0000, Lendacky, Thomas wrote:
> Yes and no...  it doesn't say how it is done, namely through the use of
> memblock_reserve() calls and when and where those occur.

Ah ok, so you found that out and documented it now. Good.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.