Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp3811231ybi; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:56:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwlqk5Kvh600uwniIZUq+TIRzeVOJZBfcVEpKZE+SDz10PQIxDKI4RNta5iASyEU33ClZ4C X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:29a7:: with SMTP id h36mr62884694plb.158.1560866176465; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:56:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560866176; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=riRu4Sp35I0vqarGf3yfQDbRWdavsoi660OIuCS9jawuPsKsOE51LILcHJAvhMu4p0 h/Z9E9USOqMpxaGcqkawTUD8GvjuqFhk4ECURaUrEkjf1prIhFloA5/Wh0VPr+4BaalD YueBwT+gJ+OKbkin9UzK690/oqTm9uTST36pvHM5Urahi1pDLwPmrAm8REqjuTiwkjDs T6V/sjC2QzdQTojQcjZlSKaTBu6R36iD+unMNxwcniB6qEWoQuAY/+JTVqA+m812HvV2 TS1E1+r5qu73yAjUzcJfDccgt+Ao8DX5bPfb8/rXNMXPACMQB2E4UIs5jKgPrhHU/Api DwPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:date:references:in-reply-to:cc:to:from:subject; bh=RG1cPZxVt94tbkmr90bCxo4gzCNC0t+9lV5JwiQ4yaA=; b=aLwdUVK1VWtNnO7U6JwoIjW8DixXSYq9z/pmwZwJ7XON7VCShEXNXhSQ4p3iHq20Ad vAEd3IoNAB9bVmNiyEK6fOsVpcA6rJZ5ZZToPPNllP8PYa5LkwAlDW3BcJ13bA93xZyy kqEXkA3ENwr4iC2m8SS2aWWFY+ZSawMvWaj7fDJtAAyXjCE2JW78H6xAKUCrQSDdaysW iJ08cFiWVJYs7VSCxGdaNy07gWMwswoVx3sF1eq/mvsFvO8uErNjXuua1BAi1kWpiruZ uKMtuyZe+Vwd91pfqhpfUCdCcRJGoY2WuNYPukusx6uBUuWugCrzFsK+2HOT3D8W67ci K2mw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z197si283810pgz.267.2019.06.18.06.56.00; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729078AbfFRNzo (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:55:44 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:6180 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726047AbfFRNzo (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:55:44 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5IDovN0032974 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:55:42 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2t6yqamu7r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:55:42 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:55:40 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:55:36 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5IDtaKP49086586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:55:36 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B35A4054; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:55:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F244DA405B; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:55:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhcp-9-31-103-88.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.103.88]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:55:34 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: dynamically allocate shash_desc From: Mimi Zohar To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Jarkko Sakkinen , Stefan Berger , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, LSM List , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <20190617115838.2397872-1-arnd@arndb.de> <1560786951.4072.103.camel@linux.ibm.com> <1560794826.4072.169.camel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:44:38 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19061813-0008-0000-0000-000002F4CB64 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19061813-0009-0000-0000-00002261E300 Message-Id: <1560861878.9530.17.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-18_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906180113 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 22:08 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:08 PM Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 11:55 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 13:20 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On 32-bit ARM, we get a warning about excessive stack usage when > > > > building with clang. > > > > > > > > security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:504:5: error: stack frame size > > > > of 1152 bytes in function 'ima_calc_field_array_hash' [-Werror,- > > > > Wframe-larger-than=] > > > > > > I'm definitely not seeing this. Is this problem a result of non > > > upstreamed patches? For sha1, currently the only possible hash > > > algorithm, I'm seeing 664. > > You won't see it with gcc, only with clang in some randconfig builds, > I suppose only when KASAN is enabled. > > > Every time a measurement is added to the measurement list, the memory > > would be allocated/freed. The frequency of new measurements is policy > > dependent. For performance reasons, I'd prefer if the allocation > > remains on the stack. > > Is there a way to preallocate the shash_desc instead? That would > avoid the overhead. There are 3 other SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK definitions in just ima_crypto.c, with a total of ~55 other places in the kernel.  Before fixing this particular function, I'd like to know if the "excessive stack usage" warning is limited to ima_calc_field_array_hash_tfm().  If so, what is so special about its usage of SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK? thanks, Mimi