Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751202AbVKWRNK (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:13:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751245AbVKWRNK (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:13:10 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.198]:61924 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751202AbVKWRNI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:13:08 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aauQW4XhAe4EOdARrCe/sWUqJNGjmDDabRDRIfk/BoyvSsZbF7yLXrjrbY/eVi8KB/QJemtmKIXEV+X7g7Sc5uZersT0yU4BmfY8i290PU/aae9Ox64e430MupcKgXxjb6C1hvGqBe5sYpXyxnj4d+REDDxJHCTGHQN5T43WjsE= Message-ID: <9e4733910511230913y7fe5f9cfw99bfbb077ea9c87a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:13:06 -0500 From: Jon Smirl To: Marc Koschewski Subject: Re: Christmas list for the kernel Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , Greg KH , lkml , rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk In-Reply-To: <20051123170508.GE6970@stiffy.osknowledge.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <9e4733910511221313t4a1e3c67wc7b08160937eb5c5@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910511230643j64922738p709fecd6c86b4a95@mail.gmail.com> <20051123150349.GA15449@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <9e4733910511230712y2b394851rc17fa71c6f9c6ecf@mail.gmail.com> <20051123155650.GB6970@stiffy.osknowledge.org> <20051123160520.GH15449@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <9e4733910511230837v1519d3b3t28176b1fd6017ffc@mail.gmail.com> <20051123164907.GA2981@ucw.cz> <9e4733910511230859y3879e65fp927a7aa4d71d8fee@mail.gmail.com> <20051123170508.GE6970@stiffy.osknowledge.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1091 Lines: 26 On 11/23/05, Marc Koschewski wrote: > * Jon Smirl [2005-11-23 11:59:27 -0500]: > > Another would be to have a little user space daemon that listened to > > the pty creation, and then mknod the tty nodes as need and pipe the > > data through. That would be a first step to moving to a user space > > console implementation. > > Shouldn't this be udev then? I hear people scream when 'some deamon' > created a device in /dev. Was it udev? Was is 'ttydevd'? Even > 'ondemanddevd'? udev listens to /sys/class for it's indications on when to create a node. The tty daemon would need to listen for pty creation to tell it when to create a node. Then after it creates the node it needs to maintain a pipe between the pty and tty. This is a lot different than what udev does. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/