Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp3945551ybi; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:02:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxtBOyWUK8LPecUPsRf65ZgPDeb5I+g95N99yuXGl7FzRzbVg1EkgD6eAPgyq85lbV3BnFx X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b296:: with SMTP id c22mr6124390pjr.28.1560873735218; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:02:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560873735; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q72/NH6bQ9FbOrWWwP1lrL7wrAgIIUHnNhp0hcX3seDxlNkejFdiwuWUcq48QyOcrv goxK/crVNAgaFdA8DHj2EKcMhXrlnQKMToXVCfUiXcSEVun0kQ2BufyAnChcDAnA+31P iEhHA4W0KnC2RR98xqLigh46T8r+Mfd+3U7fvGhFdX396gT0FfBTRoBxvZn/ItNBy98t K6xy6b8ve/KngjRCg1pJ1twPE13QH3f6nPaGdK3P/DNPXzkpYNb+PbVVcSkuQvNKqfcQ w/8l4LSW/gyn9Lx2lJLOmGq1syHlwPBpz/USxQpTi2R1TDjwGVZhu+M1ceXoVpq/T/BI tjUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=X5qC4Q8Sw+z7aVDHx+sxNsCOFFffwccWRiBrO8BquSo=; b=jhDQW4K3sshPlWXhrUtL8NkW0C9oYhR2K76aNcr6fxiJam4pqraIE6w/dY77iRdkA9 Y4mOusTL+CDvkP/kbebHUIeSkD9SVYzbsoVKBNl6hSt+UvgP4Mt49DuD3S9AeGY6cPgS 0MuDbkNuuhRLQkHaOI/MoblEHVrXfRt0DLEnQo68BY6s8I2WrZ3UAL2D7I7KqIuBztOJ 2XxbXReF5ZrEnBK/RHSMjB/Gqz6oLDWQ7LDbs1Kd/GPgu+vl63tfxf96lldHrhaIY/XG Fkc4vW8LU0amJUULm2ndAr2vSuaZoPgh5D/CD3pN6IecbgBl/Q4R0dSl/0N+E0bab+i3 5Xww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23si9007288pls.208.2019.06.18.09.01.59; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:02:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729881AbfFRQBm (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:01:42 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:3932 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729209AbfFRQBl (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:01:41 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5IFvQ99103215; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:00:17 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2t724g32ud-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:00:17 -0400 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5IFvYBc103895; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:00:15 -0400 Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2t724g32td-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:00:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x5IFtFRo012294; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:00:14 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2t4ra6mnf5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:00:14 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x5IG0D7G32571842 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:00:13 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C465B208D; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:00:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58606B2071; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:00:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.26]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:00:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8ED1916C5DF4; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:00:14 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: john.hubbard@gmail.com Cc: LKML , John Hubbard , Frederic Weisbecker , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lockdep: fix warning: print_lock_trace defined but not used Message-ID: <20190618160014.GP26519@linux.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com References: <20190609135114.GX28207@linux.ibm.com> <20190610000933.29578-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190610000933.29578-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-06-18_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906180126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 05:09:33PM -0700, john.hubbard@gmail.com wrote: > From: John Hubbard > > Commit 0d2cc3b34532 ("locking/lockdep: Move valid_state() inside > CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") moved the only usage of > print_lock_trace() that was originally outside of the CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING > case. It moved that usage into a different case: CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING && > CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS. That leaves things not symmetrical, and as a result, > the following warning fires on my build, when I have > > !CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && !CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING > > set: > > kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2821:13: warning: ‘print_lock_trace’ defined > but not used [-Wunused-function] > > Fix this by annotating print_lock_trace() with "__maybe_unused". > Thanks to Paul E. McKenney for suggesting this less intrusive fix, > as compared to adding more ifdef noise. > > Fixes: 0d2cc3b34532 ("locking/lockdep: Move valid_state() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") > > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Linus Torvalds > Cc: Paul E. McKenney > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Will Deacon > Signed-off-by: John Hubbard Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney > --- > kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c > index c47788fa85f9..2726dafdb29b 100644 > --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c > @@ -2818,7 +2818,8 @@ static inline int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, > return 1; > } > > -static void print_lock_trace(struct lock_trace *trace, unsigned int spaces) > +static void __maybe_unused print_lock_trace(struct lock_trace *trace, > + unsigned int spaces) > { > } > #endif > -- > 2.21.0 >