Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932118AbVKWSBr (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:01:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932121AbVKWSBr (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:01:47 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:10404 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932118AbVKWSBq (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:01:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:00:05 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Luiz Fernando Capitulino Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@osdl.org, ehabkost@mandriva.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] - usbserial: race-condition fix. Message-ID: <20051123180005.GA26433@suse.de> References: <20051122195926.18c3221c.lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> <20051122221353.GA10311@suse.de> <20051123093655.5555f23e.lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051123093655.5555f23e.lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1671 Lines: 46 On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 09:36:55AM -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:13:53 -0800 > Greg KH wrote: > > | On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 07:59:26PM -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote: > | > @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ struct usb_serial_port { > | > struct usb_serial * serial; > | > struct tty_struct * tty; > | > spinlock_t lock; > | > + struct semaphore sem; > | > | You forgot to document what this semaphore is used for. > > Okay. > > | Hm, can we just use the spinlock already present in the port structure > | for this? Well, drop the spinlock and use the semaphore? Yeah, that > | means grabbing a semaphore for ever write for some devices, but USB data > | rates are slow enough it wouldn't matter :) > > As far as I read the code, I found that spinlock is only used by the > generic driver, in the > drivers/usb/serial/generic.c:usb_serial_generic_write() function. No, lots of other usb-serial drivers use it. Increase your grep a bit wider :) > Can we drop the spinlock there and use our new semaphore? Or should we > create a new spinlock just to use there? Create a new one for where? > I ask it because the semaphore will be used to serialize open()/close() > operations in the usb-serial driver, is a bit weird to use the same > semaphore in a write() function of other driver. I agree, but yet-another-lock isn't the best either. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/