Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:07:29 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
        Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
        Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/5] net: stmmac: introduce IEEE 802.1Qbv
 configuration functionalities
Message-ID: <20190619030729.GA26784@lunn.ch>
References: <1560893778-6838-1-git-send-email-weifeng.voon@intel.com>
 <1560893778-6838-2-git-send-email-weifeng.voon@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1560893778-6838-2-git-send-email-weifeng.voon@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:36:14AM +0800, Voon Weifeng wrote:

Hi Voon

> +static int est_poll_srwo(void *ioaddr)
> +{
> +	/* Poll until the EST GCL Control[SRWO] bit clears.
> +	 * Total wait = 12 x 50ms ~= 0.6s.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned int retries = 12;
> +	unsigned int value;
> +
> +	do {
> +		value = TSN_RD32(ioaddr + MTL_EST_GCL_CTRL);
> +		if (!(value & MTL_EST_GCL_CTRL_SRWO))
> +			return 0;
> +		msleep(50);
> +	} while (--retries);
> +
> +	return -ETIMEDOUT;

Maybe use one of the readx_poll_timeout() macros?

> +static int est_read_gce(void *ioaddr, unsigned int row,
> +			unsigned int *gates, unsigned int *ti_nsec,
> +			unsigned int dbgb, unsigned int dbgm)
> +{
> +	struct tsn_hw_cap *cap = &dw_tsn_hwcap;
> +	unsigned int ti_wid = cap->ti_wid;
> +	unsigned int gates_mask;
> +	unsigned int ti_mask;
> +	unsigned int value;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	gates_mask = (1 << cap->txqcnt) - 1;
> +	ti_mask = (1 << ti_wid) - 1;
> +
> +	ret = est_read_gcl_config(ioaddr, &value, row, 0, dbgb, dbgm);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		TSN_ERR("Read GCE failed! row=%u\n", row);

It is generally not a good idea to put wrappers around the kernel
print functions. It would be better if all these functions took struct
stmmac_priv *priv rather than ioaddr, so you could then do

	netdev_err(priv->dev, "Read GCE failed! row=%u\n", row);

> +	/* Ensure that HW is not in the midst of GCL transition */
> +	value = TSN_RD32(ioaddr + MTL_EST_CTRL);

Also, don't put wrapper around readl()/writel().

> +	value &= ~MTL_EST_CTRL_SSWL;
> +
> +	/* MTL_EST_CTRL value has been read earlier, if TILS value
> +	 * differs, we update here.
> +	 */
> +	if (tils != dw_tsn_hwtunable[TSN_HWTUNA_TX_EST_TILS]) {
> +		value &= ~MTL_EST_CTRL_TILS;
> +		value |= (tils << MTL_EST_CTRL_TILS_SHIFT);
> +
> +		TSN_WR32(value, ioaddr + MTL_EST_CTRL);
> +		dw_tsn_hwtunable[TSN_HWTUNA_TX_EST_TILS] = tils;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int est_set_ov(void *ioaddr,
> +		      const unsigned int *ptov,
> +		      const unsigned int *ctov)
> +{
> +	unsigned int value;
> +
> +	if (!dw_tsn_feat_en[TSN_FEAT_ID_EST])
> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> +	value = TSN_RD32(ioaddr + MTL_EST_CTRL);
> +	value &= ~MTL_EST_CTRL_SSWL;
> +
> +	if (ptov) {
> +		if (*ptov > EST_PTOV_MAX) {
> +			TSN_WARN("EST: invalid PTOV(%u), max=%u\n",
> +				 *ptov, EST_PTOV_MAX);

It looks like most o the TSN_WARN should actually be netdev_dbg().

   Andrew