Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190612083252.15321-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
 <20190612083252.15321-11-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> <a1c125d2-1c7a-c190-8b7e-845a2ec1d2ea@ti.com>
 <CAHQ1cqG7dPFarphmBWSSqYAuO=6Kev4eFsBM09zUDJFek3UaOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHQ1cqG7dPFarphmBWSSqYAuO=6Kev4eFsBM09zUDJFek3UaOg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:33:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqEG=Y+PKTV8it-qXzhmGskY2Uy=72VA8rKZu_ho9+4LcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/15] drm/bridge: tc358767: Add support for
 address-only I2C transfers
To:     Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Andrey Gusakov <andrey.gusakov@cogentembedded.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Cory Tusar <cory.tusar@zii.aero>,
        Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:22 AM Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:48 AM Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 12/06/2019 11:32, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > > Transfer size of zero means a request to do an address-only
> > > transfer. Since the HW support this, we probably shouldn't be just
> > > ignoring such requests. While at it allow DP_AUX_I2C_MOT flag to pass
> > > through, since it is supported by the HW as well.
> >
> > I bisected the EDID read issue to this patch...
> >
>
> I don't think I've had any problems on my end with this. I'll double
> check. It might be the case that yours is the only setup where the
> problem can be repro'd, though. We can drop this patch if you don't
> have time/would rather not dig into this.
>

Turns out I do have this problem. Just didn't pay enough attention to
notice. Will fix in v6.

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov