Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp475224ybi; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 02:45:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz2rzhsuGytAKIUTvMIWqBBOEQ91ECEaVAKJZjgO+OnnG2maQpBCph4KrEss7j+lgEk/5cB X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2ec1:: with SMTP id h1mr10248707pjs.101.1560937539624; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 02:45:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560937539; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=T2Camg9J49gqMwY+vKmBBP4A3MNX1ZTVuxdujDpho0iIKLEjp50esTGWAn59kKx/e7 xYxQ7/Uxyx+GfGnhkccXq1Dk5bTp4IjD1P+ngulshbbyDE5Gs3MUS32WqPwMW75fh8Po Ii2JYy8mpUIQR19N1+16kc8KR29I84rgmu4oBcyh9maFYUuB/4z2VBo/EOQFOHlh7JT/ ndP44qB6eSECJgl4OxLZzu5TsCc/AQTpvBaqgv/9MLLpIy/2XKd01iHPPkE26vF7w8ZB +Qm0AElgj8pj+drd7C5Ja+RLaulw08Uuz6SgjKdjY3RQMjmn40N870p65ZENIOvZfLdB vyZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=ZzxVwH9y0Jdl/b5ZQZSuL4fRjW8Z8yShlaI4ziQm3rw=; b=UGarq+xyBd0tlaMawCK7SXQHS/nmNQuQqmUF5sr3zR6NmyK/rTkssy2stUt4yAoRK9 vbPBdJzzVFm1RBY+uMYx6v2t7hxN4GOKB9L/Gb0QkrZ9w9BPZT/wbCALRc9FXwBE+OU6 VuK4fpDF498IyAvvosryl+cXgAj0ALObJDEl8rAYpyHqkk9DTZCTjlv5bRKdkXyJW1U/ yq51iQVG9m8yxEPUWeyaGi66Jf2Aab/R26y+uccRlxJMcrtuELWYg2cLjDxhL7fYc84c R69HsKpGnq0sHlA4JstKySZP+1R/TPl2910Fy0869I2STVbohIRVhw5ubo2iEboPjQKv hWHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cb13si6607738plb.325.2019.06.19.02.45.24; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 02:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731494AbfFSJn5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:43:57 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:54694 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726958AbfFSJn5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:43:57 -0400 X-UUID: ee0b787ffbe942d3b8affeb73a9c4042-20190619 X-UUID: ee0b787ffbe942d3b8affeb73a9c4042-20190619 Received: from mtkmrs01.mediatek.inc [(172.21.131.159)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mhqrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 2020406080; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:43:49 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.30) by mtkmbs01n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:43:41 +0800 Received: from [172.21.77.4] (172.21.77.4) by MTKCAS06.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:43:42 +0800 Message-ID: <1560937422.2158.22.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/14] soc: mediatek: Add multiple step bus protection control From: Weiyi Lu To: Nicolas Boichat CC: Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , James Liao , Fan Chen , linux-arm Mailing List , lkml , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , srv_heupstream Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:43:42 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20190319080140.24055-1-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> <20190319080140.24055-11-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 13:57 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:02 PM Weiyi Lu wrote: > > > > Both MT8183 & MT6765 have more control steps of bus protection > > than previous project. And there add more bus protection registers > > reside at infracfg & smi-common. Also add new APIs for multiple > > step bus protection control with more customize arguments. > > > > Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu > > --- > > drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 2 +- > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 24 ++++++ > > include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h | 39 ++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c > > create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile > > index 64ce5eeaba32..b9dbad6b12f9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > > obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ) += mtk-cmdq-helper.o > > -obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_INFRACFG) += mtk-infracfg.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_INFRACFG) += mtk-infracfg.o mtk-scpsys-ext.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP) += mtk-pmic-wrap.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_SCPSYS) += mtk-scpsys.o > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..f630edb2f65d > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc. > > + * Author: Owen Chen > > + */ > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#define MTK_POLL_DELAY_US 10 > > +#define MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT USEC_PER_SEC > > + > > +static int set_bus_protection(struct regmap *map, u32 mask, u32 ack_mask, > > + u32 reg_set, u32 reg_sta, u32 reg_en) > > +{ > > + u32 val; > > + > > + if (reg_set) > > + regmap_write(map, reg_set, mask); > > + else > > + regmap_update_bits(map, reg_en, mask, mask); > > + > > + return regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, reg_sta, > > + val, (val & ack_mask) == ack_mask, > > + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > > +} > > + > > +static int clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *map, u32 mask, u32 ack_mask, > > + u32 reg_clr, u32 reg_sta, u32 reg_en) > > +{ > > + u32 val; > > + > > + if (reg_clr) > > + regmap_write(map, reg_clr, mask); > > + else > > + regmap_update_bits(map, reg_en, mask, 0); > > + > > + return regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, reg_sta, > > + val, !(val & ack_mask), > > + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > > +} > > + > > +int mtk_scpsys_ext_set_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table, > > + struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common) > > +{ > > + int i; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < MAX_STEPS && bp_table[i].mask; i++) { > > + struct regmap *map; > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (bp_table[i].type == IFR_TYPE) > > + map = infracfg; > > + else if (bp_table[i].type == SMI_TYPE) > > + map = smi_common; > > + else > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + ret = set_bus_protection(map, > > + bp_table[i].mask, bp_table[i].mask, > > + bp_table[i].set_ofs, bp_table[i].sta_ofs, > > + bp_table[i].en_ofs); > > + > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > Should you undo the rest of the operations and clear bus protection on > the ones that were already enabled? > Actually we assume all bus protection operations need to be done successfully, undo might not be a very useful error handling here. But I'll consider it carefully. > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +int mtk_scpsys_ext_clear_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table, > > + struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common) > > +{ > > + int i; > > + > > + for (i = MAX_STEPS - 1; i >= 0; i--) { > > So when you set protection, you stop at the first bp_table[i].mask == > 0, but when you clear it, you call clear_bus_protection for those, as > well. You should just skip over the ones when bp_table[i].mask == 0? > > e.g. > if (!bp_table[i].mask) > continue; > I'll use the idea of INVALID_TYPE = 0 to fix. > > + struct regmap *map; > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (bp_table[i].type == IFR_TYPE) > > + map = infracfg; > > + else if (bp_table[i].type == SMI_TYPE) > > + map = smi_common; > > + else > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + ret = clear_bus_protection(map, > > + bp_table[i].mask, bp_table[i].clr_ack_mask, > > + bp_table[i].clr_ofs, bp_table[i].sta_ofs, > > + bp_table[i].en_ofs); > > + > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > Similar question, is it ok to just abort? Or should you try to clear > the protection on all others, too? > > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > > index c6360de4e41e..181bf7bce591 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > > > #include > > #include > > @@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ static const char * const clk_names[] = { > > * @basic_clk_name: provide the same purpose with field "clk_id" > > * by declaring basic clock prefix name rather than clk_id. > > * @caps: The flag for active wake-up action. > > + * @bp_table: The mask table for multiple step bus protection. > > */ > > struct scp_domain_data { > > const char *name; > > @@ -132,6 +134,7 @@ struct scp_domain_data { > > enum clk_id clk_id[MAX_CLKS]; > > const char *basic_clk_name[MAX_CLKS]; > > u8 caps; > > + struct bus_prot bp_table[MAX_STEPS]; > > }; > > > > struct scp; > > @@ -155,6 +158,7 @@ struct scp { > > struct device *dev; > > void __iomem *base; > > struct regmap *infracfg; > > + struct regmap *smi_common; > > struct scp_ctrl_reg ctrl_reg; > > bool bus_prot_reg_update; > > }; > > @@ -291,6 +295,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd) > > ret = mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(scp->infracfg, > > scpd->data->bus_prot_mask, > > scp->bus_prot_reg_update); > > + } else if (scpd->data->bp_table[0].mask) { > > + ret = mtk_scpsys_ext_set_bus_protection(scpd->data->bp_table, > > + scp->infracfg, > > + scp->smi_common); > > } > > > > return ret; > > @@ -305,6 +313,11 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd) > > ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg, > > scpd->data->bus_prot_mask, > > scp->bus_prot_reg_update); > > + } else if (scpd->data->bp_table[0].mask) { > > + ret = mtk_scpsys_ext_clear_bus_protection( > > + scpd->data->bp_table, > > + scp->infracfg, > > + scp->smi_common); > > } > > > > return ret; > > @@ -475,6 +488,17 @@ static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev, > > return ERR_CAST(scp->infracfg); > > } > > > > + scp->smi_common = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, > > + "smi_comm"); > > + > > + if (scp->smi_common == ERR_PTR(-ENODEV)) { > > + scp->smi_common = NULL; > > + } else if (IS_ERR(scp->smi_common)) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot find smi_common controller: %ld\n", > > + PTR_ERR(scp->smi_common)); > > + return ERR_CAST(scp->smi_common); > > + } > > + > > for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { > > struct scp_domain *scpd = &scp->domains[i]; > > const struct scp_domain_data *data = &scp_domain_data[i]; > > diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..d0ed295c88a7 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > > +#ifndef __SOC_MEDIATEK_SCPSYS_EXT_H > > +#define __SOC_MEDIATEK_SCPSYS_EXT_H > > + > > +#define MAX_STEPS 4 > > + > > +#define BUS_PROT(_type, _set_ofs, _clr_ofs, \ > > + _en_ofs, _sta_ofs, _mask, _clr_ack_mask) { \ > > + .type = _type, \ > > + .set_ofs = _set_ofs, \ > > + .clr_ofs = _clr_ofs, \ > > + .en_ofs = _en_ofs, \ > > + .sta_ofs = _sta_ofs, \ > > + .mask = _mask, \ > > + .clr_ack_mask = _clr_ack_mask, \ > > + } > > + > > +enum regmap_type { > > Maybe add INVALID_TYPE = 0, so that you can skip over those when > looping over them, instead of checking if mask is 0? > Thanks for advise. I'll use it in next version. > > + IFR_TYPE, > > + SMI_TYPE, > > + MAX_REGMAP_TYPE, > > This is not used, right? Do you really need it? > I'll remove it. > > +}; > > + > > +struct bus_prot { > > + enum regmap_type type; > > + u32 set_ofs; > > + u32 clr_ofs; > > + u32 en_ofs; > > + u32 sta_ofs; > > + u32 mask; > > + u32 clr_ack_mask; > > +}; > > + > > +int mtk_scpsys_ext_set_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table, > > + struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common); > > +int mtk_scpsys_ext_clear_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table, > > + struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common); > > + > > +#endif /* __SOC_MEDIATEK_SCPSYS_EXT_H */ > > -- > > 2.18.0 > >