Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:45:43 -0300
From:   Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: devinfo: BLIST_TRY_VPD_PAGES for SanDisk
 Cruzer Blade
Message-ID: <20190619094540.GA26980@continental>
References: <20190618013146.21961-1-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>
 <20190618013146.21961-2-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>
 <yq1r27quuod.fsf@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yq1r27quuod.fsf@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:21:22PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Marcos,
> 
> > Currently, all USB devices skip VPD pages, even when the device
> > supports them (SPC-3 and later), but some of them support VPD, like
> > Cruzer Blade.
> 
> What's your confidence level wrt. all Cruzer Blades handling this
> correctly? How many devices have you tested this change with?

I've tested three Cruzer Blades that I have at hand, and all  of them have VPD
support, and also checked with a friend of mine that also have one. I can't say
about "all others" but so far, 4/4 devices that I tested have VPD. (They were all
SPC-3 or SPC-4 compliant).

> 
> -- 
> Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering