Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/2] clocksource: davinci-timer: new driver
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
References: <20190605083334.22383-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <1ac8cfcf-1d77-9b6b-4aab-4171f6cf80fc@ti.com>
 <67e4688a-09d5-61a3-7406-a91f55045004@linaro.org>
 <5250ca8e-81bf-6b93-1f00-8121605e9baf@linaro.org>
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Message-ID: <92ed1030-db75-9da6-b990-0ff92c169fbe@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:23:35 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5250ca8e-81bf-6b93-1f00-8121605e9baf@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 18/06/19 11:33 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 14/06/2019 16:25, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 14/06/2019 12:39, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On 05/06/19 2:03 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is another version of the new davinci clocksource driver. After much
>>>> discussion this contains many changes to simplify and improve the driver.
>>>
>>> Does this look good to you now? If yes, can you please merge and provide
>>> an immutable branch to me so I can merge dependent mach-davinci patches?
>>
>> Yes, I think it is fine.
>>
>> http://git@git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git
>> timers/drivers/davinci
>>
>> It is v5.2-rc4 + (2 x patches)
>>
>> It is merged in clockevents/next which is exported to linux-next and for
>> kernel-ci.
>>
>> AFAIU, the patch was compiled and tested. If not, please let me know.
>>
>> Please, wait a couple of days I confirm the tests passed and you can
>> consider the branch immutable.
> 
> lkp complained, please do not use the branch.
> 
> I'm waiting for Bartosz to fix the issue.

Alright, noted.

Thanks,
Sekhar