Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp609024ybi; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:03:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygNF2xp4eP04CeJn71F1TxBeheq0yP+NWXKvmVJIcbMz9LGL2yK/2VVhecdYGsF987W+wG X-Received: by 2002:a62:1807:: with SMTP id 7mr37674543pfy.149.1560945834839; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:03:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560945834; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qU/H/HGwXfzPjLPSsv9AXzjUOhkmtSlGY29yzZuqCSP+Erg2Uyp6P2OtTw3YgR+vrd bL03YnjT2xcXh4qD9wt3izJQgI4UFZhrlDKiGsvZ5WEJsEQlHwSOxFsa4LpVj1f/gOpr /s9BPsZHqK3FwvP1VxKy63ydY97pGEQeEXojm742BEGknxGcPW6riuRiLR6npiqTQlEJ SDM1UIrn9WlfQfzQIjFc3B9VzQUW4JTmtZnmd3g4BElW31IRhNjNqKQpdNhHbNzkoovw o7w4uo5dDr16VEq0JP/8vVO0XtFEnrG26apuLWUd2eSvpuEqaGoZK9JfL0cMFL3FgioX fwbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=UUNDJ4YT5sYe2FSF11R8Qj2KGP81ymPOsgrPA4bzlUM=; b=Zy6N7WVKdC5dZjUg/cTpghX3uB8+wVD5CQyi8ormUXf+LgWIjj1YXzQphJ5MLf24Tu CBQgkFWvvmRaqg3m9u5Ly0WfVC+57iqOR37k8OV/IjYl2EXkB5YocgeIyfseYYf7bjyd +Qmt3At5UxeE/kdNYRMPuwgManAlodZUS7nndaK2TWNZrLHGar6oBajNrsx6jE3UPASh PeXjq8leSBCn8fAN3EpJrVKVvBLl5UWeSdo4u6Qpbi/M9FaCQ91saQrfV25a7Hpd9KZb zoH5gG5qWqZ+IXE3zScKdaLxjgDumqqGXS3T8XPA6+TkbVvf5P6qoL8HeOrZnG4vV4J9 J4hQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=tGUQUW65; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 186si2934357pgc.47.2019.06.19.05.03.36; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=tGUQUW65; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731686AbfFSMDU (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:03:20 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f196.google.com ([209.85.222.196]:46473 "EHLO mail-qk1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726246AbfFSMDU (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:03:20 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f196.google.com with SMTP id x18so10662624qkn.13; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:03:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=UUNDJ4YT5sYe2FSF11R8Qj2KGP81ymPOsgrPA4bzlUM=; b=tGUQUW65p6WjgVCM2/lZ12D8gBKslhHKRm5kkwDJN4DXSuK4hLzZAwUvjukLfRQeGE yMWqA79F5yIo11HDizUNdV3vX4zxcPy/yz/7Y2c/BdCQAP0pAD/pT01zIbpTIrMVhG6a pWWoBrCXg2Gr8HV/xcIUifnm4emFfzDrG9VADVfGzhrNybHtTeJwJf91XNHHTmD77O2G 34E19ceLrLkYYaUqMoc8M9w5F9/n+Dbf6kBnIHyr6Ezkj+wZDHR7SAci+GGI2rr+EC4y CPOGu5tv2LpKzVGl3rdCp7uqtyHjgIEvp/YctuzPs5QUhGZ2MS6K4+VUueNs1SVHRK/a H71g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=UUNDJ4YT5sYe2FSF11R8Qj2KGP81ymPOsgrPA4bzlUM=; b=kwXkKndAa4S6Lq/k4ZpXe5Xm39uYpOCNy30d39fhuixXOVkkzF2PgbqSH5VMPnQ5HL HLsMWHSO0l67DwFp482TJOYZE7M7C5yH77J7Ba0bMCmmgxFZla0TNqnrMLIy3nHeJmKH 5/ugnRReJ0EwCMeLqwydaUbaKLg71rFjbOLKdBnrU5YLN9u7ltqdxX6C+7u55qfx016b zA0IMQ65AG8aMtHUPprkKC0CBCRde5XQ0F0dFoHTx8sal73wIi0K+vZVsnTsFShg1DEY 5OYT2hjuI4xBwyVCxWzmM+Nj5ZyrCK4QdytavSUp4g8bq/N9bfnZqlfdMTmFncpXnBn4 zJmw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWVE5w99SEORduMKVlj/B1WbifmhGbHVN4Oo6I8dDN4zkPagHY4 MKEC6+eGzRbPDs53LdH02iM= X-Received: by 2002:a37:696:: with SMTP id 144mr95924137qkg.250.1560945799007; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from continental ([186.212.50.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s134sm10974868qke.51.2019.06.19.05.03.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:03:52 -0300 From: Marcos Paulo de Souza To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: devinfo: BLIST_TRY_VPD_PAGES for SanDisk Cruzer Blade Message-ID: <20190619120346.GC26980@continental> References: <20190618013146.21961-1-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> <20190618013146.21961-2-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> <20190619094540.GA26980@continental> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190619094540.GA26980@continental> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 06:45:43AM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:21:22PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > > > Marcos, > > > > > Currently, all USB devices skip VPD pages, even when the device > > > supports them (SPC-3 and later), but some of them support VPD, like > > > Cruzer Blade. > > > > What's your confidence level wrt. all Cruzer Blades handling this > > correctly? How many devices have you tested this change with? > > I've tested three Cruzer Blades that I have at hand, and all of them have VPD > support, and also checked with a friend of mine that also have one. I can't say > about "all others" but so far, 4/4 devices that I tested have VPD. (They were all > SPC-3 or SPC-4 compliant). > My first idea was to add a vendor:product mapping at SCSI layer, but so far I haven't found one, so I added the model/vendor found by INQUIRY. Would it be better to check for prod:vendor (as values, instead of the description)? Thanks, Marcos > > > > -- > > Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering