Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp627298ybi; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:19:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw0ZGOyuh3xih/h8qo5BbK1WGw0Cu+o5B0z+toObMsCVrCLDDMZIfm0FozfU8oOrVjdjIel X-Received: by 2002:a65:4848:: with SMTP id i8mr7346327pgs.380.1560946778583; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:19:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560946778; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mZSnfzl4cR1e23sJXPIbKjG62mOyAocFDb3qJQiDi5XiSCB7VlCIzpvJDyGkM0JI7f EYUFHy8tXgXxbZMUA7vwApw5WEjGqcW0P3f8dG0kNiN2xuXNzXF81cebNX0auaNgxmZ7 RMObDuU+5WDckL3+wByubb26ibna8ocfcbz2hAdJ4i411LAk+KtmKbXfgGIWjgIve2aY ViWNQouFFT1+3wV3v3JE0qqZdZrFzPTta7mKJOffUwvTK3ZUURbv7Lfc01tPWMBDOFHk caG16AIOhNsrQ71YityuVoROQUfnbdpvszoJh179GuDphDlVp8PkzaatD/t+75FSsfSi TdkQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=/5I4q4yIrim1wWtun5Nfc1Qs4XjO+F2xtytrvY8KQ84=; b=V+SLKiCnjwbMOcNF95AYbCvPQAOCOhxGYaRte7fMKryXF9P4hSqiq/Xdp5fkcD9h9n /HPjTsthST3QQRgBrV+TNQncDOP1Sm2KVaDtY0cHJ/QNPT7uDoBweAyQF3zpJe57BwOK Utm0huIdF4RJdJrEJ2uOt/1FOyHFRWDSH8QMnYVJbYVUbbbmRYjZtUwceaGdV0s/W57o pxqK+6v0MFAD01dkQxGOnPp883DiQHofjo0FWso4SFIalEWP9Bz9nGZb6/OsESQo18qT OsAfEDyOCEHn3VNfHI75SPZWypvlb+6uAluDDHfcKStZq+oCgKZO50Tx24RMsg/2Y95S 50mg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g14si2927273pgo.579.2019.06.19.05.19.23; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731702AbfFSMSw (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:18:52 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:36714 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726246AbfFSMSw (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:18:52 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC31EC0A; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fuggles.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1AF53F738; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:18:48 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: jinho lim Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, andreyknvl@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seroto7@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove useless condition Message-ID: <20190619121848.GE7767@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190619113857.5053-1-jordan.lim@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190619113857.5053-1-jordan.lim@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+86 (6f28e57d73f2) () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 08:38:57PM +0900, jinho lim wrote: > dump_instr function checks user_mode internally. > > Signed-off-by: jinho lim > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > index ccc13b45d9b1..694e78b950ca 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c > @@ -182,8 +182,7 @@ static int __die(const char *str, int err, struct pt_regs *regs) > print_modules(); > show_regs(regs); > > - if (!user_mode(regs)) > - dump_instr(KERN_EMERG, regs); > + dump_instr(KERN_EMERG, regs); I don't think this is right, because it means we'll now dump the current user instruction on the die() path. Instead, we should probably rename dump_instr to dump_kernel_instr(), and have it return immediately if user_mode(regs). We can also kill __dump_instr completely. Will