Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S276069AbRJGCzt>; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 22:55:49 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S276058AbRJGCzj>; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 22:55:39 -0400
Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.25]:34577 "EHLO
	barry.mail.mindspring.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S276069AbRJGCza>; Sat, 6 Oct 2001 22:55:30 -0400
Subject: Re: low-latency patches
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110061938140.796-100000@desktop>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110061938140.796-100000@desktop>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15.99+cvs.2001.10.05.08.08 (Preview Release)
Date: 06 Oct 2001 22:55:59 -0400
Message-Id: <1002423362.1911.98.camel@phantasy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 2001-10-06 at 22:38, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2001, Robert Love wrote:
> 
> > If we can achieve such great results, and keep throughput low, and do it
>                                                             ^^^
> > with such little complexity -- of course, after we prove all this -- why
> > not merge it?  Anyhow, its a configure option!
> 
> heh.

I guess we should aim to keep them high, eh?


	Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/