Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp2250990ybi; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:37:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzWU9TqXjEEm/I07JM5lR3KCyvkKbEzXgpa1x4i1mPiWhu/MoGcce1Or1ZtYicyHd57T3I+ X-Received: by 2002:a62:ac1a:: with SMTP id v26mr111167128pfe.184.1561055853143; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:37:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561055853; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yL5JCja00QVCl+HvqKerFP/uX9Ym9WKWHJ4HDjiQZURgOj6ZlIwe+ECMCSl9ga/4PA SwL3j3CAA2ZaABNWapbN4FRWdvhRZPEe2a5DZpuSANzztTEYVE7AImdZahUTCumRXp0i yinHKawxERL69dgu/gzHecY+HTfaNDVwdQ/x2skB1ONfUDHQl58jtW4q1ufxJsiYzfBd X64IeUgAcIZjcvG55Un2bFqbRowO6+LyXHIz+4DvyYu20Q2qBsYt2pDnsPs0460Jr6RZ hziICjjW4YmTNm3A2H+I1pMXPsOfHKMvT+sYqassEy89TFYi2x4cuKIsli67JW3LiDSx IHxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=5s/l0ITYvPky32c4CeJ1RE7LMqmdddmdnmEyaty1EJM=; b=JCKUKmnwD+To4zLI36NkCx6321lERG4NUWkb1vGXF4l6UP3djc3SrJ3pf77QrfTys7 ULRTUiyHC+o9n0OtF11HYg6gq091AMuAsRYGdcQ5TZ/g/IDCLxqQcJYSXyTXkpqHN4kH GZ07JIWOM13bqyObS7khBaPsL1EtHbzkPkBZxgtpWR6EFF1lPMtOgaGtkFMRr73V4g7B CZ6AM2DAy7NHdp5xh/BAHhU+ouXMqYZn0kTfgB+S//4WSM4qqTYadnJ97kv5SwMMjT25 UJKe47cQFvjUi/JVJl5l9brFNamDdKYbLLr5TL4aUyOgHJCbp9W8W/OVYVMGTR7iPTtO e/Jg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=OrHZBkER; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ci23si415114pjb.106.2019.06.20.11.37.17; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=OrHZBkER; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726451AbfFTShP (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:37:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:44977 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726328AbfFTShO (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:37:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id n2so2004223pgp.11 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:37:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5s/l0ITYvPky32c4CeJ1RE7LMqmdddmdnmEyaty1EJM=; b=OrHZBkERHshvedquCJ9byOzjBT0TgnCiZhTLxTEfgjlTEDWkSZ7xm23SjABY2IV7Z7 LjPocB8AGYGUUdHub0lz5lCaFc3zI4O9Pjb91wTwdEDIWnm4jqCZrdMNYbE6VUcOg21X xR+ch30YLe6NWjWRVf3BuBgQB9GQgDT+BoCz9VmF4MlXGzEhS+JCzFvBvaRbh67UrflN rtSy8aWlvd36lTbrlM/2epUswK1yO6E2GkG1zrkLYoDQEabNqXm3J3bCOl/hRxnLDsbQ vvN0Vg/f8B4wxfWplrEqSz4wd9o0VEYsCaSvbEV1c8y9DN1LgA8ABi2PGT/cQsHTR9Dw njcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5s/l0ITYvPky32c4CeJ1RE7LMqmdddmdnmEyaty1EJM=; b=qQGWcl8wNCyhm6VJ2qjDMa2s7Ag46HM619nz5fwa6cqpQmTiU/RZ/s870Kq57aWQ5R aIulvsf1rDJx6ZACMgwhsLJpE75D/vKiob5oMMS3gmDYOa/CHidUWF1RI5sN2TKO/+5o kFhYBsR5Zno3C0b47Mt+o+Ug5LVdpw13x3W9HHKcIQ9nBb3XERevXy2fA6iMHcN1J/Ie BA6cWZUtj/UxQEU0MyyijSuO5oM625tF6+7AO3lvcz0BKEDH3UE++lAJWcsqYKC1zF+C pBVBTAG++U3Ee+/prNbNr/gyrNayBmo2yGQTVOiQGHfnV01vWs64pqSOJztozIZiFaxD iahA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUYakeL59TBFehVBMwncC+pvOfBHpWpYve0z2u6IO6HHSit88iz kbHZ4wIKdvtlIalwiJySX+kbag== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2249:: with SMTP id t9mr14261464pgm.149.1561055833946; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y22sm386613pgj.38.2019.06.20.11.37.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:37:12 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Puranjay Mohan Cc: Shuah Khan , Bjorn Helgaas , netdev , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] net: fddi: skfp: Use PCI generic definitions instead of private duplicates Message-ID: <20190620113712.4630f60f@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190620180754.15413-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> References: <20190620180754.15413-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 23:37:51 +0530 Puranjay Mohan wrote: > This patch series removes the private duplicates of PCI definitions in > favour of generic definitions defined in pci_regs.h. > > This driver only uses one of the generic PCI definitons, i.e. > PCI_REVISION_ID, which is included from pci_regs.h and its private > version is removed from skfbi.h with all other private defines. > > The skfbi.h defines PCI_REV_ID which is renamed to PCI_REVISION_ID in > drvfbi.c to make it compatible with the generic define in pci_regs.h. > > Puranjay Mohan (3): > net: fddi: skfp: Rename PCI_REV_ID to PCI_REVISION_ID > net: fddi: skfp: Include generic PCI definitions > net: fddi: skfp: Remove unused private PCI definitions > > drivers/net/fddi/skfp/drvfbi.c | 4 +- > drivers/net/fddi/skfp/h/skfbi.h | 207 +------------------------------- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 208 deletions(-) > Does anyone still have the hardware to test this? Maybe FDDI should be put out to pasture.