Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161027AbVKXG5N (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:57:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161025AbVKXG5N (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:57:13 -0500 Received: from mail.metronet.co.uk ([213.162.97.75]:12002 "EHLO mail.metronet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161024AbVKXG5K (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:57:10 -0500 From: Alistair John Strachan To: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:491 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:57:11 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 Cc: Con Kolivas , Kenneth W , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200511232256.jANMuGg20547@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <200511232335.15050.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <20051124044009.GE30849@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20051124044009.GE30849@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511240657.11480.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1752 Lines: 52 On Thursday 24 November 2005 04:40, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:35:15PM +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 23:24, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > Chen, Kenneth W writes: > > > > Has people seen this BUG_ON before? On 2.6.15-rc2, x86-64. > > > > > > > > Pid: 16500, comm: cc1 Tainted: G B 2.6.15-rc2 #3 > > > > > > > > Pid: 16651, comm: sh Tainted: G B 2.6.15-rc2 #3 > > > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > > Please try to reproduce it without proprietary binary modules linked > > > in. > > > > AFAIK "G" means all loaded modules are GPL, P is for proprietary > > modules. > > The 'G' seems to confuse a hell of a lot of people. > (I've been asked about it when people got machine checks a lot over > the last few months). > > Would anyone object to changing it to conform to the style of > the other taint flags ? Ie, change it to ' ' ? I don't understand the reasons for making the tainted string all the same length anyway. Why not just remove all the extra spaces? Unless you know what you're looking for, I can assure you that: Tainted: G B SOMEOTHERTEXT Is not intuitively readable (which text does B belong to?). Tainted: B SOMEOTHERTEXT Is better, but still not very good. Why not drop the spaces? 3rd party parsing purposes? -- Cheers, Alistair. 'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.' Third year Computer Science undergraduate. 1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/