Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:01:28 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
        Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 11/16] sched/fair: uclamp: Add uclamp support to
 energy_compute()
Message-ID: <20190621140128.GL3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20190621084217.8167-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <20190621084217.8167-12-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190621084217.8167-12-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 09:42:12AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index ce2da8b9ff8c..f81e8930ff19 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -2322,7 +2322,6 @@ static inline unsigned long capacity_orig_of(int cpu)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>  /**
>   * enum schedutil_type - CPU utilization type
>   * @FREQUENCY_UTIL:	Utilization used to select frequency
> @@ -2338,15 +2337,11 @@ enum schedutil_type {
>  	ENERGY_UTIL,
>  };
>  
> -unsigned long schedutil_freq_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
> -				  unsigned long max, enum schedutil_type type);
> -
> -static inline unsigned long schedutil_energy_util(int cpu, unsigned long cfs)
> -{
> -	unsigned long max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu);

That conflicts with the patch I have removing that NULL argument, fixed
it up.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL
>  
> -	return schedutil_freq_util(cpu, cfs, max, ENERGY_UTIL);
> -}
> +unsigned long schedutil_cpu_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
> +				 unsigned long max, enum schedutil_type type,
> +				 struct task_struct *p);
>  
>  static inline unsigned long cpu_bw_dl(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> @@ -2375,11 +2370,8 @@ static inline unsigned long cpu_util_rt(struct rq *rq)
>  	return READ_ONCE(rq->avg_rt.util_avg);
>  }
>  #else /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL */
> -static inline unsigned long schedutil_energy_util(int cpu, unsigned long cfs)
> -{
> -	return cfs;
> -}
> -#endif
> +#define schedutil_cpu_util(cpu, util_cfs, max, type, p) 0

Was there a good reason for this to be a macro and not an inline
function? I've changed it, if it explodes in 0day, it's all my fault ;-)

> +#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL */